Integrating Water, Actors, and Structure to Study Socio-Hydro-Ecological Systems

Rebecca L Hale1, Andrea Armstrong2, Michelle A Baker3, Sean Bedingfield2, David Betts2, Caleb Amoa Buahin4, Martin Buchert5, Todd Crowl2, Ryan Dupont2, Joanna Endter-Wada6, Courtney Flint7, Jacqualine Grant8, Sarah Hinners9, Daniel Mather Horns10, Jeffery S Horsburgh11, Douglas Jackson-Smith2, Amber Spackman Jones12, Carlos Licon2, Sarah E Null13, Augustina Odame2, Diane E Pataki14, David E Rosenberg15, Madlyn Runburg16, Philip Stoker9 and Courtenay Strong17, (1)Idaho State University, Biological Sciences, Pocatello, United States, (2)Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States, (3)Utah State University, Department of Biology, Logan, United States, (4)Utah State University, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Logan, UT, United States, (5)University of Utah, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, (6)Utah State University, Environment and Society, Logan, United States, (7)Utah State University, Department of Sociology, Social Work and Anthropology, Logan, UT, United States, (8)Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT, United States, (9)University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, (10)Utah Valley University, Department of Earth Science, Orem, UT, United States, (11)Utah State University, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Logan, United States, (12)Utah State University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Logan, United States, (13)Utah State University, Department of Watershed Sciences, Logan, UT, United States, (14)University of Utah, Department of Biology, Salt Lake City, United States, (15)Utah State University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Logan, United States, (16)Utah Museum of Natural History, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, (17)University of Utah, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Salt Lake City, United States
Abstract:
Urbanization, climate uncertainty, and ecosystem change represent major challenges for managing water resources. Water systems and the forces acting upon them are complex, and there is a need to understand and generically represent the most important system components and linkages. We developed a framework to facilitate understanding of water systems including potential vulnerabilities and opportunities for sustainability. Our goal was to produce an interdisciplinary framework for water resources research to address water issues across scales (e.g., city to region) and domains (e.g., water supply and quality, urban and transitioning landscapes). An interdisciplinary project (iUTAH – innovative Urban Transitions and Aridregion Hydro-sustainability) with a large (N=~100), diverse team having expertise spanning the hydrologic, biological, ecological, engineering, social, planning, and policy sciences motivated the development of this framework. The framework was developed through review of the literature, meetings with individual researchers, and workshops with participants. The Structure-Water-Actor Framework (SWAF) includes three main components: water (quality and quantity), structure (natural, built, and social), and actors (individual and organizational). Key linkages include: 1) ecological and hydrological processes, 2) ecosystem and geomorphic change, 3) planning, design, and policy, 4) perceptions, information, and experience, 5) resource access, and 6) operational water use and management. Our expansive view of structure includes natural, built, and social components, allowing us to examine a broad set of tools and levers for water managers and decision-makers to affect system sustainability and understand system outcomes. We validate the SWAF and illustrate its flexibility to generate insights for three research and management problems: green stormwater infrastructure in an arid environment, regional water supply and demand, and urban river restoration. These applications show that the framework can help identify key components and linkages across diverse water systems.