Inferring unknow boundary conditions of the Greenland Ice Sheet by assimilating ICESat-1 and IceBridge altimetry intothe Ice Sheet System Model.

Eric Y Larour, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, Ala Khazendar, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, Helene L Seroussi, Dartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering, Hanover, United States, Nicole Jeanne Schlegel, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, Beata M Csatho, University at Buffalo, Department of Earth Sciences, Buffalo, NY, United States, Anton F Schenk, University at Buffalo, Department of Geology, Buffalo, United States, Eric J Rignot, University of California Irvine, Department of Earth System Science, Irvine, CA, United States and Prof. Mathieu Morlighem, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
Abstract:
Altimetry signals from missions such as ICESat-1, CryoSat, EnviSat, as well as altimeters onboard Operation IceBridge provide vital insights into processes such as surface mass balance, mass transport and ice-flow dynamics. Historically however, ice-flow models have been focused on assimilating surface velocities from satellite-based radar observations, to infer properties such as basal friction or the position of the bedrock. Here, we leverage a new methodology based on automatic differentation of the Ice Sheet System Model to assimilate surface altimetry data into a reconstruction of the past decade of ice flow on the North Greenland area. We infer corrections to boundary conditions such as basal friction and surface mass balance, as well as corrections to the ice hardness, to best-match the observed altimetry record. We compare these corrections between glaciers such as Petermann Glacier, 79 North and Zacchariae Isstrom. The altimetry signals exhibit very different patterns between East and West, which translate into very different signatures for the inverted boundary conditions. This study gives us greater insights into what differentiates different basins, both in terms of mass transport and ice-flow dynamics, and what could be
the controlling mechanisms behind the very different evolutions of these basins.
Back to: Linking Cryospheric Observations and Modeling II