Aspects of Decision-Making for Risk Reduction during the Prolonged Earthquake Sequence in Canterbury, New Zealand
Abstract:
We study the use of aftershock forecasts in decision-making across the roles of policy makers, emergency managers and responders, critical infrastructure providers, insurers, communication officers, scientists, and the public. We held focus groups and interviews involving 53 participants using a semi-structured message centered approach in May and June of 2013. Transcripts from the focus groups and interviews were thematically coded using qualitative analysis.
Responses to a pre-questionnaire suggested that aftershock information for decision-making increases slightly in importance throughout the four phases of a disaster – mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery. We summarize our findings from this research, including
- the use and barriers to the use of aftershock forecasts in decision-making across the disaster phases by roles
- conflicts of interest that arise in the decision-making hierarchy
- challenges with providing and using forecasts during a prolonged event.
Finally, we reflect on implications for Operational Earthquake Forecasting and how our findings may be generalized to other prolonged hazards.
