T11B:
In Situ Stress Field: Observations, Uncertainties, and Modeling Posters

Submit an Abstract to this Session



Session ID#: 23235

Session Description:
The knowledge of in situ stresses is important for a variety of applied and fundamental problems in geosciences, including large-scale tectonics, fault mechanics, reservoir geomechanics, and stability of engineering structures. In recent years, significant improvements in the stress field analysis have been driven by the need to address seismic hazards, both natural and human-induced, but in situ stress information remains sparse, especially offshore. While stress is known to vary consistently at regional scale, local variations are often observed, and remain challenging to predict and quantify. In addition, temporal evolution of in situ stresses needs to be better understood for accurate assessment of seismic hazard and deformation processes. We invite results on recent in situ stress observations, as well as experimental and modeling studies, which advance our understanding of stress patterns and heterogeneity in the shallow crust, and advance our capability to evaluate and predict in situ stresses.
Primary Convener:  Natalia V Zakharova, Central Michigan University, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Mount Pleasant, MI, United States
Conveners:  Chandong Chang, Chungnam National University, Department of Geological Sciences, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of (South) and Hiroki Sone, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States; University of Wisconsin-Madison, Geological Engineering Program, Madison, United States
Chairs:  Chandong Chang, Chungnam National University, Department of Geological Sciences, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of (South), Natalia V Zakharova, Central Michigan University, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Mount Pleasant, MI, United States and Hiroki Sone, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Geological Engineering Program, Madison, United States; University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Natalia V Zakharova, Central Michigan University, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Mount Pleasant, MI, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • NH - Natural Hazards
  • NS - Near Surface Geophysics
  • S - Seismology
Index Terms:

0545 Modeling [COMPUTATIONAL GEOPHYSICS]
0994 Instruments and techniques [EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS]
7223 Earthquake interaction, forecasting, and prediction [SEISMOLOGY]
8164 Stresses: crust and lithosphere [TECTONOPHYSICS]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Borehole Breakout Growth and In-Situ Stress Orientation in the Central Scandinavian Caledonides: Results from the Cosc-1 Borehole (215073)
Alba Zappone, ETH Zurich, Institute of Geophysics, Zurich, Switzerland, Quinn Wenning, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland, Theo Berthet, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, Maria V S Ask, Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, Sweden, Jan-Erik Rosberg, Lund University, Lund, Sweden and Bjarne Sven Guestav Almqvist, Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Estimation of Stress Field in a Reservoir in the Onnagawa Formation, Akita Region, Japan (227220)
Yudai Kayamoto1, Weiren Lin2, Kimikazu Tsusaka3, Yu Nagano4 and Miki Mura3, (1)Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, (2)Kyoto University, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, (3)INPEX Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, (4)JOGMEC Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation, Technology & Research Center, Chiba, Japan
In-situ stress states at the toe of the Nankai Trough off Muroto, SW Japan determined by anelastic strain recovery method (227595)
Tatsuhiro Sugimoto1, Yuzuru Yamamoto2, Weiren Lin3, Yuhji Yamamoto4, Takehiro Hirose5, Nana Kamiya6, Verena Heuer7, Fumio Inagaki8, Yuki Morono9, Yusuke Kubo10, Lena Maeda2 and Expedition 370 Scientists, (1)Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, (2)JAMSTEC, Yokohama, Japan, (3)Kyoto University, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, (4)Geol. Surv. Japan, AIST, Research Institute of Geology and Geoinformation, Tsukuba, Japan, (5)JAMSTEC, Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Nankoku, Japan, (6)Doshisha University, Department of Environmental System Sciences, Kyoto, Japan, (7)Bremen University, Bremen, Germany, (8)JAMSTEC, Kochi, Japan, (9)JAMSTEC, Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Kochi, Japan, (10)JAMSTEC, Kochi Core Center, Nankoku, Japan
Deciphering second order spatial stress variations from multiple data sources, the case of the Neuquén basin in Argentina (231092)
Josselin Berthelon1, Thomas Maurin2, Marianne Conin3, Bruno Leclère4, Antoine Mazuyer5, Charles T Aubourg4 and Damien Dhont2, (1)Laboratoire GeoRessources (UMR 7359, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CREGU), Nancy, France, (2)TOTAL - Centre Scientifique et Technique Jean Feger, Pau, France, (3)Université de Lorraine, Laboratoire GeoRessources (UMR 7359), Nancy, France, (4)Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour (UPPA), Pau, France, (5)University of Lorraine, GeoRessources laboratory, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
Stress rotation along pre-Cenozoic basement structures (231269)
Karsten Reiter1, Oliver Heidbach2 and Andreas Henk1, (1)Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Darmstadt, Germany, (2)GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Constraints on paleo-stress magnitude from triaxial test results and stress inversion analysis of Nankai accretionry prism sediments (234306)
Yoshitaka Hashimoto, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan, Michael Stipp, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria, Jonathan C Lewis, Indiana University of Pennsylvania Main Campus, Anthropology, Geospatial and Earth Sciences, Indiana, PA, United States and Frank Wuttke, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Lithology-dependent In Situ Stress in Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoirs (238329)
Chuyen Ngoc Pham, Chungnam National University, Department of Geology, Daejeon, South Korea and Chandong Chang, Chungnam National University, Department of Geological Sciences, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of (South)
True-triaxial experimental seismic velocities linked to an in situ 3D seismic velocity structure (242555)
Maria Tibbo, University of Toronto, Physics, Toronto, ON, Canada and R. Paul Young, University of Toronto, Civil and Mining Engineering, Toronto, Canada
The feature of the focal mechanism solutions and tectonic stress field around the focus of Zaduo earthquake (Ms 6.3) in eastern Tibet (253810)
Yu Yang1, Zuoxun Zeng2, Xiao Shuang2 and Xianrui Li2, (1)Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, United States, (2)China University of Geosciences Wuhan, Wuhan, China
Defining in-situ stress magnitude and the responses of geology to stress anisotropy in heterogeneous lithologies for the United Kingdom (255778)
Andrew Kingdon1, Mark Fellgett1 and John D.O. Williams2, (1)British Geological Survey Keyworth, Nottinghamshire, NG12, United Kingdom, (2)British Geological Survey Keyworth, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
From point-wise stress data to a continuous description of the 3D crustal in situ stress state (256585)
Oliver Heidbach1, Moritz Ziegler2, Karsten Reiter3 and Tobias Hergert3, (1)GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (2)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (3)Technical University Darmstadt, Institute of Applied Geoscienes, Darmstadt, Germany
Borehole Breakout Derived Constraints on Stress Regimes in the Santa Barbara Channel, Offshore Southern California (259207)
Edward Harris Pritchard, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States, Patricia Persaud, Louisiana State University, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Baton Rouge, United States and Joann M Stock, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
Italian Present-day Stress Indicators: IPSI Database (269917)
Maria Teresa Mariucci and Paola Montone, INGV Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy

See more of: Tectonophysics