G015-II
Recent Advances in SAR and InSAR Data Processing, Big Data analysis and Applications to Earth Observation II Poster

Session ID#: 72380

Session Description:
The recent increase in SAR data, the result of an unprecedented number of satellites, including Sentinel-1A/B and the upcoming NISAR satellite, and the increasing variety of data they produce, has resulted in a golden age of SAR and InSAR results.  This wealth of data has resulted in enormous scientific opportunities coupled with significant technical and logistical challenges. Here we solicit contributions detailing methods and strategies that address these opportunities and challenges, highlighting recent SAR and InSAR developments in the following areas: (1) Data processing techniques that take full advantage of the densely sampled time-series information and development of new data products; (2) Advances in big data analytics, deep learning and cloud-based processing techniques applied to SAR and InSAR, and development and distribution of value-added products. (3) Submissions that employ new analysis strategies and applications using the wide variety of SAR and InSAR data available today to analyze complex geoscience problems.
Index Terms:

1240 Satellite geodesy: results [GEODESY AND GRAVITY]
1241 Satellite geodesy: technical issues [GEODESY AND GRAVITY]
1294 Instruments and techniques [GEODESY AND GRAVITY]
1295 Integrations of techniques [GEODESY AND GRAVITY]


Primary Convener:  Kristy French Tiampo, University of Colorado Boulder, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Dept. of Geological Sciences, Boulder, United States
Conveners:  Jingyi Chen, University of Texas at Austin, Aerospace Engineering & Engineering Mechanics, Austin, TX, United States and Franz Josef Meyer, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States
Primary Liaison:  Kristy French Tiampo, University of Western Ontario, Department of Earth Sciences, London, ON, Canada
Chairs:  Jingyi Chen, University of Texas at Austin, Aerospace Engineering & Engineering Mechanics, Austin, TX, United States, Kristy French Tiampo, University of Western Ontario, Department of Earth Sciences, London, ON, Canada and Franz Josef Meyer, University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Jingyi Chen, University of Texas at Austin, Aerospace Engineering & Engineering Mechanics, Austin, TX, United States
 
ARIA Standardized InSAR Product Toolbox: Accessible Management and Manipulation of open-access ARIA Standardized InSAR Products with an Application over the Afar Depression in Eastern Africa (549858)
Simran Sangha1, David P Bekaert2, Emre Havazli2, Brett A Buzzanga3, Gilles Peltzer1,2 and ARIA Team, (1)University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (2)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, (3)Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States
 
A Fully Automated P-SBAS Processing Pipeline for Sentinel-1 DInSAR time-series Generation within the AWS Cloud Computing Environment (533556)
Claudio de Luca1, Manuela Bonano2, Francesco Casu1, Michele Manunta1, Mariarosaria Manzo1, Franz Josef Meyer3, Giovanni Onorato1, Ivana Zinno1 and Riccardo Lanari1, (1)CNR Institute for the Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, Naples, Italy, (2)IMAA, CNR, Tito Scalo, Italy, (3)University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States
 
Large Scale InSAR computation, analysis and presentation (619599)
Matthew Thomas Calef, Los Alamos, NM, United States, Rick Chartrand, Descartes Labs, Inc., Los Alamos, NM, United States and Michael S Warren, None, College Station, TX, United States
 
Towards a revised framework of constraint time series InSAR for ground deformation monitoring (595897)
Zheyuan Du, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia and Esther Qinggaozi Zhu, NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, Sydney, NSW, Australia
 
Global Operational Earthquake Response with Imaging Geodesy (540708)
William D Barnhart, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States, Gavin P Hayes, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, United States and David J Wald, USGS National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, CO, United States
 
Spatial and Temporal Detection of Co-Seismic Surface Deformation in InSAR using Artificial Neural Networks (499179)
Clayton Brengman, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States and William D Barnhart, USGS National Earthquake Information Center Golden, Golden, CO, United States
 
Optimized, InSAR-based models for the 2017-2018 M 6+ Mexico earthquakes: unveiling the role of resolution (534547)
Simone Atzori1, Andrea Antonioli1, Cristiano Tolomei1, Vincenzo De Novellis2, Claudio de Luca2 and Fernando Monterroso3, (1)Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy, (2)CNR Institute for the Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, Naples, Italy, (3)University of Naples "Parthenope", Napoli, Italy
 
Rapid characterization of 2019 Mw7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake using 3D Finite Element Modeling and geodetic data (591717)
Magali Barba-Sevilla1,2, Margaret T Glasscoe3, Michael J Willis4,5, Jay W Parker3, Gregory A Lyzenga3, Wanpeng Feng6, Sergey V Samsonov7 and Kristy French Tiampo8,9, (1)University of Colorado at Boulder, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Dept. of Geological Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Department of Geological Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States, (5)University of Colorado at Boulder, Geological Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States, (6)Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, (7)Canada Centre for Remote Sensi, Ottawa, ON, Canada, (8)University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Geological Sciences, Boulder, United States, (9)Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, United States
 
Landslide Recognition, Mapping and Monitoring using InSAR: Vega and Green Mountain reservoirs Case Studies (592604)
Glenda Besana-Ostman, Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Denver, CO, United States
 
Deep Learning Application on Volcanic Deformation Detection and Blind Source Separation in InSAR Data (606341)
Jian Sun1, Christelle Wauthier, Kirsten Stephens3, Melissa Gervais4, Guido Cervone1, Peter C La Femina5 and Machel Higgins6, (1)Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, University Park, PA, United States, (2)University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, (3)Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, University Park, PA, United States, (4)Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, Department of Geosciences, University Park, PA, United States, (5)The Pennsylvania State University, Geological Sciences, University Park, PA, United States
 
Land Subsidence in Western US Mapped Using Machine Learning (599585)
Ryan Smith, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, United States
 
The Norwegian National Ground Motion Service (InSAR.no): Service Evolution (586197)
Marie Bredal1, John Fitzgerald Dehls1, Yngvar Larsen2, Petar Marinkovic3, Tom Rune Lauknes2, Daniel Stødle2 and Dag Anders Moldestad4, (1)Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim, Norway, (2)Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Tromsø, Norway, (3)PPO Labs, The Hague, Netherlands, (4)Norwegian Space Agence, Oslo, Norway
 
Modeling the Effect of Soil Moisture Changes on InSAR phase and SAR intensity (505830)
Yusuf Eshqi Molan and Zhong Lu, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, United States
 
Deep Learning-based Damage Mapping with InSAR Coherence Time Series (616202)
Oliver Stephenson1, Tobias Koehne2, Eric Zhan2, Brent Cahill2, Zachary E. Ross1, Mark Simons3 and Sang-Ho Yun4, (1)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (3)CALTECH, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
Effect of Surface Characteristics on Sentinel-1 SAR Observations for Detecting Freeze and Thaw States in Boreal Regions (565131)
Marzi Azarderakhsh, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ, United States, Dr. Satya Prakash, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, Veronica Hernandez, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, United States and Amir AghaKouchak, University of California, Irvine, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Irvine, CA, United States
 
Understanding InSAR Persistent Scatterer Distributions with a Multi-Scatterer Multiplicative Model (489801)
Stacey Huang, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States and Howard A Zebker, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA, United States
 
Phase Unwrapping using Deep Convolutional Autoencoder (597399)
Marwa S. Moustafa, National Authority for Remote Sensing & Space Sciences, Data Reception, Analysis and Receiving Station Affairs, Cairo, Egypt and Hind H. Zeyada, National Authority for Remote Sensing, Data Reception, Analysis and Receiving Station Affairs, Cairo, Egypt
 
Atmospheric Correction on Large-scale Sentinel-1 InSAR Time-series Using a Machine Learning-based Regression Technique (603133)
Roghayeh Shamshiri1, Mahdi Motagh2, Hossein Nahavandchi1 and Mahmud Haghshenas-Haghighi3, (1)Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, (2)Helmholtz Center Potsdam, GFZ, Potsdam, Germany, (3)Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Potsdam, Germany
 
Integration of SAR and optical images to measure the 3D coseismic deformation in hanging wall of Chelungpu Fault during 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake (577188)
Chih-Heng Lu1, Ya-Shien Lin2 and Ray Y Chuang1, (1)National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, (2)National Taiwan University, Department of Geography, Taipei, Taiwan
 
Delineating Ground Deformation over Mega-Oil Fields in Kuwait Using Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) Technique (512906)
Abdullah Othman, Umm Al-Qura University, Natural Hazards Research Unit, Department of Environmental and Health Research, Mecca, Saudi Arabia and Abotalib Z. A Farag, Western Michigan University, Department of Geosciences, Kalamazoo, MI, United States
 
Mapping Surface Roughness over the Greater Houston Area using Polarimetric and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar Data (506092)
Ke Wang, University of Texas at Austin, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Austin, TX, United States, Jingyi Chen, University of Texas at Austin, Aerospace Engineering & Engineering Mechanics, Austin, TX, United States, Amin Kiaghadi, University of Houston, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Houston, TX, United States and Clint Dawson, University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Austin, TX, United States
 
Estimating fault configurations from InSAR data (489265)
Cameron Saylor, Davis, California, United States and John B Rundle, University of California Davis, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Davis, CA, United States
 
Landslide Time-Series Analysis Using SAR Amplitude Images and PS-InSAR: Case Study of Sinwulyu River Watershed (540328)
Pinyin Liu1, Ray Y Chuang1 and Chih-Heng Lu2, (1)National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, (2)Graduate Institute of Applied Geology, National Central University, Graduate Institute of Applied Geology, Taoyuan, Taiwan
 
From Level-1 to Level-3: Integrating Time Series Analysis Into the Sentinel-1-based SARVIEWS Volcano Monitoring Service (619699)
David B McAlpin1, Franz Josef Meyer1,2, Kirk Hogenson2,3, Rowan Biessel4,5 and Kim D Fairbanks4,5, (1)University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (2)Alaska Satellite Facility, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (3)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (4)Alaska Satellite Facility, Fairbanks, United States, (5)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, United States
 
Value Added Products based on Nationwide Sentinel-1 Persistent Scatterer Interferometry Datasets in the Framework of the Ground Motion Service Germany (536135)
Andre Cahyadi Kalia, Michaela Frei and Thomas Lege, BGR Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Hannover, Germany
 
From mapping to monitoring - InSAR monitoring of the wider Seattle area (538532)
John Fitzgerald Dehls1, Susan Chang2, Steve Hou2, Mark Joselyn3, Juan Carlos Ramirez4, Trevor Contreras5, Abigail Gleason6, Gregory Wessel7, Cathleen Jones8, Yngvar Larsen9 and Petar Marinkovic10, (1)Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim, Norway, (2)City of Seattle, Geotechnical Engineering, Seattle, WA, United States, (3)City of Seattle, Seattl, WA, United States, (4)City of Seattle, Seattle, WA, United States, (5)Washington State. Department of Natural Resources, Forest Practices Division, Olympia, WA, United States, (6)Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Port Angeles, WA, United States, (7)King County, Permitting Division, Seattle, WA, United States, (8)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, (9)Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Tromsø, Norway, (10)PPO Labs, The Hague, Netherlands
 
Geodetic Imaging with Large SAR Data Sets using NASA High End Computing (629411)
Susan E Owen1, Hook Hua1, Lei Pan2, David P Bekaert3 and Gerald Manipon1, (1)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)JPL/NASA/Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
Automated Processing, Streaming, and Integration of InSAR Time Series and GNSS Data; as part of the Collaborative GeoSciFramework Research Project (551663)
Brie D Corsa, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States; University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Geologic Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States, Kristy French Tiampo, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, United States; University of Colorado Boulder, Department of Geological Sciences, Boulder, United States, Krisztina Kelevitz, University of Colorado at Boulder, CIRES, Boulder, United States, Scott Baker, UNAVCO, Inc., Boulder, CO, United States and Charles Meertens, UNAVCO, Inc. Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
 
Non-linear phase inversion package for time series analysis (600554)
Sara Mirzaee1, Falk Amelung1 and Heresh Fattahi2, (1)University of Miami, Department of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Miami, FL, United States, (2)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
On scaling InSAR to a planetary scale - the final frontier (585577)
Yngvar Larsen1, John Fitzgerald Dehls2, Kirk Hogenson3, Tom Rune Lauknes1, Petar Marinkovic4, Franz Josef Meyer5 and Daniel Stødle1, (1)Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Tromsø, Norway, (2)Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim, Norway, (3)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (4)PPO Labs, The Hague, Netherlands, (5)University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States
 
Development of the small SAR sensor for the drone-based observation (528031)
Tomonori Deguchi, Nittetsu Mining Consultants, Tokyo, Japan
See more of: Geodesy
<< Previous Session Proposal | Next Session Proposal >>