S018
Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Storage of CO2
Session ID#: 75525
Session Description:
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) continues to be studied as a means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate change using geologic storage of CO2. Ongoing worldwide large-scale projects for geologic CO2 storage and/or utilization pose many scientific questions linking academic and industrial research. Geophysical monitoring using such as time-lapse active seismic, passive seismic, ERT, gravity, potential field, InSAR, etc, plays a crucial role in monitoring CO2 injection and subsurface migration, and in ensuring safe long-term storage. We solicit abstracts on experimental, computational, lab and field-scale studies of geophysical monitoring for geologic CO2 storage, particularly on field-scale demonstration projects.
Index Terms:
0599 General or miscellaneous [COMPUTATIONAL GEOPHYSICS]
0999 General or miscellaneous [EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS]
7290 Computational seismology [SEISMOLOGY]
7299 General or miscellaneous [SEISMOLOGY]
Primary Convener: Lianjie Huang, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Geophysics Group, Los Alamos, NM, United States
Conveners: Thomas M Daley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Berkeley, CA, United States, Xianjin Yang, Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA, United States and Michel Verliac, Total, Borehole Geophysics Senior Specialist TOTAL S.A. EXPLO/GTS/MTG/IDI Innovation, Development and Industrialization CSTJF - Avenue Larribau, Pau, France
Primary Liaison: Lianjie Huang, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Geophysics Group, Los Alamos, NM, United States
Comparing simultaneous methods of gas flux quantification, offshore Panarea, Mediterranean Sea (492865)
Ben Roche1, Jianghui Li2, Jonathan M Bull3, Paul White4, Michele Deponte5, Emiliano Gordini5 and Diego Cotterle5, (1)University of Southampton, Southampton, SO14, United Kingdom, (2)Institute of Sound and Vibration Research (ISVR), Southampton, United Kingdom, (3)University of Southampton, Ocean and Earth Science, Southampton, SO14, United Kingdom, (4)University of Southampton, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Southampton, United Kingdom, (5)OGS (National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics), Trieste, Italy
Exploring ambient noise correlation technique for monitoring CO2 injection at the CaMI Field Research Station (507054)
Marie Macquet, University of Calgary - CREWES - CMC Reasearch Institutes Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada, Don Lawton, CMC Research Institutes Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada, Genevieve Savard, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada and Hersh J Gilbert, University of Calgary, Department of Geoscience, Calgary, AB, Canada
Use of high-resolution 3D marine seismic for overburden monitoring at the Tomakomai CO2 storage project, Hokkaido, Japan (Invited) (511615)
Timothy A Meckel1, Ye Erickson Feng2 and Ramon Trevino2, (1)Univ. Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States, (2)University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
A controlled CO2 gas release within the shallow sediments of the North Sea (STEMM-CCS) – monitoring and quantification (514628)
Jonathan M Bull1, Douglas Connelly2, Christopher R Pearce3, Veerle A I Huvenne4, Ben Roche5, Jianghui Li6, Michael Faggetter7, Paul White8, Anita Flohr5, Dirk Koopmans9 and Scientific Team of James Cook 180 and STEMM-CCS consortium, (1)University of Southampton, Ocean and Earth Science, Southampton, SO14, United Kingdom, (2)National Oceanography Centre, NERC, Southampton, United Kingdom, (3)National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom, (4)National Oceanography Centre (NOC), Marine Geoscience, Southampton, United Kingdom, (5)University of Southampton, Southampton, SO14, United Kingdom, (6)Institute of Sound and Vibration Research (ISVR), Southampton, United Kingdom, (7)University of Southampton, Ocean and Earth Science, Southampton, United Kingdom, (8)University of Southampton, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Southampton, United Kingdom, (9)Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany
Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence as an efficient plant parameter for CO2 leakage from CCS site (533474)
He Wenmei1, Gayoung Yoo2, Youngryel Ryu3, Jeehwan Bae4 and Benjamin Dechant3, (1)Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, South Korea, (2)Kyung Hee University, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Yongin, South Korea, (3)Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea, (4)Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)
Feasibility of active seismic and electromagnetic methods for detecting secondary CO2 plumes (557845)
Erika Gasperikova1, Michael Commer2, Pierre Jeanne1, Quanlin Zhou1, Kai Gao3, David Alumbaugh4, Lianjie Huang3 and Thomas M Daley5, (1)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States, (2)Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, CA, United States, (3)Los Alamos National Laboratory, Geophysics Group, Los Alamos, NM, United States, (4)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States, (5)Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Berkeley, CA, United States
Monitoring Seismicity near a CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Sequestration Site in Kansas (558801)
Keith Nolte1, Georgios P Tsoflias1 and Yevhen Holubnyak2, (1)The University of Kansas, Department of Geology, Lawrence, KS, United States, (2)Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Energy Research, Lawrence, KS, United States
Location of CO2 Leakage Plumes by Deep Learning Inversion of Gravity Data (558832)
Xianjin Yang1, Xiao Chen1, Kayyum Mansoor2, Thomas A Buscheck3 and Susan Carroll4, (1)Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United States, (2)Lawrence Livermore National Lab, Livermore, CA, United States, (3)Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - LLNL, Atmospheric, Earth, and Energy Division, Livermore, CA, United States, (4)Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA, United States
Optimization of borehole EM geophysical measurements for CO2 injection pressure management (560147)
David L Alumbaugh1, Michael Commer2, Abdullah Cihan3, Michael Wilt4, Evan S Um5, Jens Birkholzer1, Robert C Trautz6, Robin Petrusak7, David E Riestenberg7 and Mike Godec8, (1)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States, (2)Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, CA, United States, (3)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth & Environmental Sciences, Berkeley, CA, United States, (4)GroundMetrics, Inc, San Diego, CA, United States, (5)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States, (6)Electric Power Research Institute Paolo Alto, Palo Alto, CA, United States, (7)Advanced Resources International, Arlington, VA, United States, (8)Golden, CO, United States
Seismic attributes, and CT scans in Hyrdocarbon-reservoir characterization: reservoir petrophysical facies signatures, Wellington Field, Kansas, USA (561176)
Luke Rijfkogel, Kansas State University, Geology, Manhattan, KS, United States and Abdelmoneam E Raef, Kansas State University, Department of Geology, Manhattan, KS, United States
Time-lapse monitoring for CO2 injection at Farnsworth EOR field using 3D double-difference elastic-waveform inversion (567538)
Xuejian Liu1, Lianjie Huang1, Kai Gao1, Paige A Czoski2 and George El-kasee3, (1)Los Alamos National Laboratory, Geophysics Group, Los Alamos, NM, United States, (2)New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, United States, (3)New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, United States
Continuous CO2 reservoir monitoring over ten days using a permanent seismic source (568018)
Naoyuki Shimoda1, Masashi Nakatsukasa2, Masaru Ichikawa1, Ayato Kato1 and Donald John White3, (1)JOGMEC Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation, Chiba, Japan, (2)Sakhalin Energy Investment Companies, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, (3)Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Passive seismic monitoring at the CaMI Field Research Station, Alberta, Canada (569859)
Hersh J Gilbert1, Genevieve Savard2, Marie Macquet3, Donald Caleb Lawton2,4 and Yu Jeffrey Gu5, (1)University of Calgary, Department of Geoscience, Calgary, AB, Canada, (2)University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, (3)University of Calgary - CREWES - CMC Reasearch Institutes Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada, (4)Carbon Management Canada, Calgary, AB, Canada, (5)University of Alberta, Physics, Edmonton, AB, Canada
CO2 Monitoring Using Hybrid Structural-Petrophysical Joint Inversion at the CaMI Field Research Station (CaMI.FRS), Canada (578113)
Michael Jordan1, Dennis Rippe2, Anouar Romdhane1, Marie Macquet3 and Donald Caleb Lawton4, (1)SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway, (2)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (3)University of Calgary - CREWES - CMC Reasearch Institutes Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada, (4)University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Reduced-Order Modelling of CO2 Dissolution Trapping Rates and Plume Propagation in Heterogenous Porous Media (586415)
Kieran Gilmore1, Jerome A Neufeld2, Mike Bickle1 and Adam Butler1, (1)University of Cambridge, Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom, (2)University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, BP Institute & Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Continuous intelligent seismic monitoring of a CO2 injection during Stage 3 of the CO2CRC Otway Project (598885)
Julia Correa1, Roman Pevzner2,3, Barry M Freifeld1,4, Thomas M Daley1, Todd Wood1, Konstantin Tertyshnikov2,3, Sinem Yavuz2,3 and Stanislav Glubokovskikh2,3, (1)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States, (2)CO2CRC ltd., Melbourne, VIC, Australia, (3)Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia, (4)Class VI Solutions, Oakland, CA, United States
CO2 storage in reservoir and seal rocks – rock physics implications (Invited) (601909)
Manika Prasad, Colorado School of Mines, Department of Geophysics, Golden, CO, United States, Manju Murugesu, Colorado School of Mines, Petroleum Engineering, Golden, CO, United States and Mathias Pohl, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, United States
Geophysical Monitoring with Seismic Contrast Agent Nanofluids (619178)
Todd Schaef1, Quin RS Miller2, Satish K Nune3 and B. Pete McGrail2, (1)Pacific Northwest National Lab, Richland, WA, United States, (2)Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States, (3)Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, United States
