PA018
Current Challenges to Science-informed Air Quality and Climate Policies: Where We Go From Here

Session ID#: 77526

Session Description:
For decades the United States has benefitted from air pollution protections backed by science. From ambient air quality standards to industrial emission controls to climate mitigation efforts, many federal policies are required to protect public health. Yet, recent efforts to change science and process at the US Environmental Protection Agency now threaten the longstanding role of science in federal air pollution and climate policy development. Science advice has diminished, data collection has declined, science-informed policy processes have been upended. Other proposals may restrict the kinds of science that can inform policy decisions in the first place. Focusing on EPA policy developments in recent years, this session will examine the implications of proposed and actual changes to how the country approaches air quality and climate protections and offer ways researchers and decisionmakers can ensure science informs US air pollution and climate policy.
Index Terms:

0305 Aerosols and particles [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE]
6304 Benefit-cost analysis [POLICY SCIENCES & PUBLIC ISSUES]
6324 Legislation and regulations [POLICY SCIENCES & PUBLIC ISSUES]
6615 Legislation and regulations [PUBLIC ISSUES]


Primary Convener:  Gretchen T Goldman, Union of Concerned Scientists Washington DC, Washington, DC, United States
Convener:  H. Christopher Frey, Putney, VT, United States
Primary Liaison:  Gretchen T Goldman, Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC, United States
 
Procedural and Compositional Changes to the EPA Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee Undermine the Credibility of Scientific Review of U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (492726)
H. Christopher Frey, North Carolina State University Raleigh, Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Raleigh, NC, United States
 
A New Community-based Approach to Understanding Highly Localized Pollution Impacts in Disproportionally Impacted Regions – A New Paradigm to Inform and Improve Science-based Clean Air Local Solutions in California (508142)
Alberto Ayala1,2, Mark Loutzenhiser3 and Janice Lam Snyder3, (1)Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Sacramento, CA, United States, (2)West Virginia University, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Morgantown, CA, United States, (3)Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Planning and Coordination Division, Sacramento, United States
 
Cutting Science Out of the Picture: Implications of Recent Changes to Federal Air Pollution Policy and How to Ensure Health-Protective Decisions (519196)
Gretchen T Goldman and Genna Reed, Union of Concerned Scientists Washington DC, Washington, DC, United States
 
The Scientific Basis for Estimating Co-Benefits of Climate Policies (551419)
Vijay Limaye, Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC, United States
 
Advancing Science-based Air Quality and Climate Protection Policy in the San Francisco Bay Area (558473)
Abby Young, Bay Area Air Quality Management District, San Francisco, CA, United States, Jakub Zielkiewicz, Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Planning and Climate Protection, San Francisco, CA, United States and Jack Broadbent, Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Executive Office, San Francisco, CA, United States
 
What do Bayesian networks have to do with the Clean Air Act? Causal inference, settled science, and public health (606347)
Lianne Sheppard1, Marco Carone2 and Ali Shojaie2, (1)University of Washington, Biostatistics, and Environmental & Occupational Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, United States, (2)University of Washington, Biostatistics, Seattle, WA, United States
 
Advocating for Science in the Three Branches of Government (611081)
Lauren Kurtz, Climate Science Legal Defense Fund (CSLDF), New York, NY, United States and Augusta Wilson, Climate Science Legal Defense Fund (CSLDF), New York, United States
 
Scientific and regulatory developments in estimating benefits: The Mercury and Air Toxics Standards and Beyond (621200)
Amanda Giang, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada and Noelle E Selin, MIT, Cambridge, MA, United States
See more of: Public Affairs