B107
Surface-Atmosphere Interactions: From Single Site Measurements to Integrated Syntheses

Session ID#: 78859

Session Description:
Our understanding of energy, water, and greenhouse gas cycling within the earth system is grounded in in-situ observations. Globally, hundreds of eddy-covariance flux sites measure exchanges of energy and greenhouse gases between the atmosphere and a wide variety of land surface types.

Many flux sites contribute to regional networks and the global FLUXNET, providing globally synthesized and comprehensive datasets. Such joint efforts serve as the foundation for studying energy, water, and greenhouse gas cycling from local to global, and from diel to decadal scales.

This session focuses on the current state and future perspectives of flux measurements, synthesis, and modeling through collaborations and partnerships. We welcome contributions that improve our understanding through advances in theories, instrumentation, models, as well as datasets. Submissions that integrate different data types across multiple sites are particularly encouraged, as well as advancements that improve our understanding of energy and greenhouse gas fluxes at specific ecosystems.

Index Terms:

0414 Biogeochemical cycles, processes, and modeling [BIOGEOSCIENCES]
0426 Biosphere/atmosphere interactions [BIOGEOSCIENCES]
0428 Carbon cycling [BIOGEOSCIENCES]
0438 Diel, seasonal, and annual cycles [BIOGEOSCIENCES]


Primary Convener:  Housen Chu, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
Conveners:  Dario Papale, University of Tuscia, Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF), Viterbo, Italy, Hongyan Luo, National Ecological Observatory Network, Battelle, Boulder, CO, United States and Sebastien Biraud, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
Primary Liaison:  Housen Chu, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
 
Assessing Management Impacts and Representation of Ecosystem Heterogeneity in Northern Wisconsin Forests: Modeling for Better Stewardship (486250)
Bailey Murphy1, Christine Rollinson2, Michael Dietze2 and Ankur R Desai3, (1)University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, United States, (2)Boston University, Boston, MA, United States, (3)University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Madison, WI, United States
 
The effects of compost application on grazed grasslands’ greenhouse gas budget, water budget, net primary productivity, and microbial communities (487780)
Thomas Fenster1, Housen Chu2, Patty Oikawa3, Margaret S Torn4 and Christopher Bradley1, (1)California State University East Bay, Biology, Hayward, CA, United States, (2)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, United States, (3)California State University East Bay, Hayward, CA, United States, (4)Berkeley Lab/UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
 
Peatland-dominated boreal ecoregions at risk of drying in a warmer climate (493056)
Manuel Helbig1, James Michael Waddington2, Pavel Alekseychik3,4, Brian D Amiro5, Mika Aurela6, Alan Barr7, Thomas A Black8, Peter Blanken9, Sean Kevin Carey10, Jiquan Chen11, Jinshu Chi12, Ankur R Desai13, Allison L Dunn14, Eugenie Susanne Euskirchen15, Thomas Friborg16, Lawrence B Flanagan17, Inke Forbrich18, Achim Grelle19, Silvie R Harder20, Michal Heliasz21, Elyn Humphreys22, Hiroki Ikawa23, Hiroki Iwata24, Pierre-Erik Isabelle25, Rachhpal Jassal26, Juliya Kurbatova27, Mika Korkiakoski28, Lars Kutzbach29, Anders Lindroth30, Takeshi Ohta31, Mikaell Ottosson Lofvenius32, Annalea Lohila6, Trofim C Maximov33, Ivan Mammarella34, Philip Marsh35, Joe Melton36, Paul Moore37, Daniel Nadeau25, Erin M Nicholls10, Mats B Nilsson38, Matthias Peichl39, Richard M Petrone40, Roman E Petrov41, William L Quinton42, Nigel T Roulet43, David E Reed44, Benjamin Runkle45, Anna Rutgersson46, Erik Sahlee46, Oliver Sonnentag47, Ian B Strachan20, Pierre Taillardat48, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila49, Juha-Pekka Tuovinen6, Jess Turner50, Masahito Ueyama51, Andrej Varlagin27, Martin Wilmking52 and Steven C Wofsy53, (1)McMaster University, School Of Geography & Earth Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada, (2)McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, (3)University of Helsinki, Department of Physics, Helsinki, Finland, (4)Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki, Finland, (5)Univ Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, (6)Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland, (7)Environment Canada, Climate Research Division, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, (8)University of British Columbia, Soil Science, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (9)University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (10)McMaster University, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada, (11)Michigan State University, Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, East Lansing, MI, United States, (12)SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umea, Umeå, Sweden, (13)University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Madison, WI, United States, (14)Worcester State University, Worcester, MA, United States, (15)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (16)University of Copenhagen, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Copenhagen, Denmark, (17)Univ Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada, (18)Marine Biological Lab, Woods Hole, MA, United States, (19)SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden, (20)McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, (21)Lund University, Physical Geography and Ecosystem Sciences, Lund, Sweden, (22)Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada, (23)International Arctic Research Center, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (24)Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan, (25)Laval University, Civil and Water Engineering, Quebec City, QC, Canada, (26)University of British Columbia, Biometeorology and Soil Physics Group, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (27)A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, (28)Greenbrae, CA, United States, (29)Universität Hamburg, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability, Institute of Soil Science, Hamburg, Germany, (30)Lund University, Lund, Sweden, (31)Nagoya University, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya, Japan, (32)SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå, Umeå, Sweden, (33)Institute for Biological Problems of the Cryolithozone, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Science, Yakutsk, Russia, (34)University of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research / Physics, Faculty of Science, Helsinki, Finland, (35)Wilfrid Laurier University, Cold Regions Research Centre, Waterloo, ON, Canada, (36)Environment and Climate Change Canada, Climate Processes Section, Victoria, BC, Canada, (37)McMaster University, Geography and Earth Sciences,, Hamilton, ON, Canada, (38)Swedish Univrsity of Agricultu, Umeä, Sweden, (39)SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå, Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Umeå, Sweden, (40)University of Waterloo, Geography and Environmental Management, Waterloo, ON, Canada, (41)Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yakutsk, Russia, (42)Wilfrid Laurier University, Geography and Environmental Studies, Waterloo, ON, Canada, (43)McGill Univ, Montreal, QC, Canada, (44)Michigan State University, Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, East Lansing, MI, United States, (45)University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States, (46)Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, (47)Université de Montréal, Département de Géographie, Montréal, QC, Canada, (48)University of Quebec at Montreal UQAM, Montreal, Canada, (49)University of Eastern Finland, School of Forest Sciences, Joensuu, Finland, (50)University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, United States, (51)Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Japan, (52)University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany, (53)Harvard University, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA, United States
 
Impacts of Vegetation Phenology on Surface-Energy Balance Dynamics: A Synthesis Integrating PhenoCam and AmeriFlux Data (504912)
Adam M Young, Northern Arizona University, School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Flagstaff, AZ, United States, Mark A Friedl, Boston University, Earth and Environment, Boston, MA, United States, Andrew D Richardson, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States and Collaborators from the AmeriFlux and PhenoCam Networks
 
2126 Past and Present Eddy Covariance Measurement Locations, and Still Counting: Let’s Discuss What We Could and Should Do (506852)
George G Burba, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, United States; University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States
 
Do Open-path Eddy Covariance CO2 Analyzers Need a Spectroscopic Correction for Fast Temperature Fluctuations in the Optical Path? (508128)
Ivan Bogoev, Campbell Scientific, Inc., Logan, UT, United States and David Holl, Universität Hamburg, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability, Institute of Soil Science, Hamburg, Germany
 
Sensitivity of Evapotranspiration to Soil Moisture over the United States Obtained from Weather Data (509062)
Qing He1,2, Kaighin A Mccoll2, Angela Jean Rigden2 and Hui Lu1, (1)Tsinghua University, Department of Earth System Science, Beijing, China, (2)Harvard University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, MA, United States
 
The Influence of Water Availability on Evapotranspiration Partitioning (521873)
Russell L Scott, Agricultural Research Service Tucson, Tucson, AZ, United States, John F Knowles, USDA-ARS, Southwest Watershed Research Center, Tucson, AZ, United States, Jacob A Nelson, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany, Xi Li, Peking University, Beijing, China, Pierre Gentine, Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States and Joel A Biederman, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
 
Mountain forest productivity across a regional climatic gradient in the southwestern USA (523964)
John F Knowles1, Greg Barron-Gafford2, Peter Blanken3, Sabina Dore4, Thomas Kolb4, Marcy E Litvak5 and Russell L Scott1, (1)USDA-ARS, Southwest Watershed Research Center, Tucson, AZ, United States, (2)University of Arizona, School of Geography and Development, Tucson, AZ, United States, (3)University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States, (5)University of New Mexico, Biology, Albuquerque, NM, United States
 
Measurements of Greenhouse Gas Exchange over a Conventionally Managed Highbush Blueberry Field in the Fraser River Delta in BC, Canada (525639)
Patrick Pow, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Thomas A Black, University of British Columbia, Soil Science, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Rachhpal Jassal, University of British Columbia, Biometeorology and Soil Physics Group, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Zoran Nesic, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Mark S. Johnson, The University of British Columbia, Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, Vancouver, BC, Canada and Sean Smukler, University of British Columbia, Sustainable Agricultural Landscapes Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada
 
Estimating the influence of seasonal changes in ecophysiological traits on canopy CO2 and H2O fluxes in a Japanese cedar forest (532594)
Yoshiaki Hata1, Tomo'omi Kumagai1, Takanori Shimizu2 and Yoshiyuki Miyazawa3, (1)The University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan, (2)Forestry & Forest Products Research Institute, Department of Disaster Prevention, Meteorology and Hydrology, Ibaraki, Japan, (3)Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
 
Warmer temperatures and frequent late summer wet periods in 2018 caused a temperate conifer stand in Eastern North America to become a small source of carbon for the first time in 16-years of flux observations (556043)
Muhammad Altaf Arain, Eric Beamesderfer, Shawn M McKenzie, Jason J Brodeur and Bing Xu, McMaster University, School of Geography and Earth Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
 
The diurnal surface fluxes-atmosphere relations in Taiwan’s montane cloud forests (570066)
Rong-Yu Gu1, Min-Hui Lo1, Chi-Ya Liao2, Jehn-Yih Juang3, Choying Huang3, Shih-Chieh Chang4, Cheng-I Hsieh5, Ming-Hsu Li6, YI-Ying Chen7, Housen Chu8 and Yen-Jen Lai9, (1)National Taiwan University, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, (2)Central Weather Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan, (3)National Taiwan University, Department of Geography, Taipei, Taiwan, (4)National Dong Hwa University, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Hualien, Taiwan, (5)National Taiwan University, Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, (6)National Central University, Graduate Institute of Hydrological and Oceanic Sciences, Taoyuan, Taiwan, (7)Academia Sinica, Research Center for Environmental Changes, Taipei, Taiwan, (8)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States, (9)National Taiwan University, Experimental Forest, Nantou, Taiwan
 
Evaluating the Biogeophysical Climate Impacts and Ecosystem Services of Chinese Forests Using the Terrestrial Ecosystem Model in R (TEMIR) Validated with FLUXNET Observations (571555)
Perry Ho Long Ma1, Amos P. K. Tai1 and David Yung2, (1)The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Graduate Division of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, (2)The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
 
Evolution and optimized extension of the high Northern latitude eddy covariance network. (578710)
Martijn Pallandt, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany, Martin Jung, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Jena, Germany and Mathias Goeckede, MPI Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
 
Gas analyzer inter-comparison field experiment for ensuring compatibility of the sensors (580883)
Minseok Kang1, Sungsik Cho1,2, Jongho Kim1 and Kyung Ha Hong3, (1)National Center for AgroMeteorology, Seoul, South Korea, (2)Seoul National University, Interdisciplinary Program in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Seoul, South Korea, (3)B&P International Co. Ltd., Seoul, South Korea
 
Design, performance testing and field validation of a new automated chamber for measurement of NEE, CH4 and N2O fluxes (584352)
Nick Nickerson1, Mara Taylor2, Chance Creelman2, Alex D Marshall2, Darren Wall2, Gregor Lucic3 and Magdalena Hofmann3, (1)Eosense Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada, (2)Eosense Inc., Dartmouth, NS, Canada, (3)Picarro, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, United States
 
Long-term observations of energy, water vapor and CO2 fluxes over a temperate deciduous forest in Tennessee (585357)
Praveena Krishnan, John Kochendorfer, Tilden P Meyers and Mark Heuer, NOAA/ARL/ATDD, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
 
Improving estimation of sub-daily vegetation GPP by optimizing VPM parameters across FLUXNET sites (596044)
Xiaocui Wu, University of Oklahoma Norman Campus, Norman, OK, United States, Xiangming Xiao, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Center for Spatial Analysis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, United States, Yao Zhang, Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States, Wei He, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, Jie Wang, University of Oklahoma Norman Campus, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Center for Spatial Analysis, Norman, OK, United States, Qing Chang, Oklahoma University, Norman, OK, United States, Russell Doughty, University of Oklahoma, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Center for Spatial Analysis, Norman, OK, United States and Yuanwei Qin, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States
 
NEON Surface-Atmosphere Exchange: Enhancing a Community Resource (599486)
Christopher R Florian1, David Durden2, Hongyan Luo2, Natchaya Pingintha Durden2, Michael SanClements1, Cove Sturtevant3 and Stefan Metzger4, (1)National Ecological Observatory Network Program, Battelle, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)National Ecological Observatory Network, Battelle, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)National Ecological Observatory Network, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)NEON, Battelle, Boulder, CO, United States
 
Greenhouse Gas Exchange above a Potato Field in the Lower Fraser Valley, BC, Canada (602859)
Ningyu Quan1, T. Andrew Black1, Rachhpal Jassal2, Zoran Nesic1, Paula Resque Porto3, Brian Wang3, Oscar Zimmerman4, Chitra Chopra3 and Sean Smukler5, (1)University of British Columbia, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (2)University of British Columbia, Biometeorology and Soil Physics Group, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (3)University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (4)University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada, (5)University of British Columbia, Sustainable Agricultural Landscapes Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada
 
A comparison between the tower-based gradient method and the automated chamber method for measuring N2O fluxes from an agricultural field (607115)
Qiurui Zhu, Jacob Hagedorn, Mark Castro and Eric A Davidson, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Appalachian Laboratory, Frostburg, MD, United States
 
Numerical experiment design doubles scientific return of surface-atmosphere synthesis (608679)
Stefan Metzger1, David Durden2, Sreenath Paleri3, Matthias Sühring4, Brian Butterworth3, Ankur R Desai3, Christopher Florian2, Matthias Mauder5, David M Plummer6, Zhien Wang7, Luise Wanner5, Ke Xu8 and Edward Sigel9, (1)National Ecological Observatory Network Program, Battelle, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)National Ecological Observatory Network, Battelle, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Madison, WI, United States, (4)Institut für Meteorologie und Klimatologie, Hannover, Germany, (5)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU), Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, (6)University of Wyoming, Atmospheric Sciences, Laramie, WY, United States, (7)University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (8)University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, (9)University of Wyoming, Laramie, United States
 
Biophysical Controls of Net Ecosystem Exchange of CO2 across Various Time-scales and Ecosystems in North America (609949)
Mohammed T. Zaki and Omar I. Abdul-Aziz, West Virginia University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Morgantown, WV, United States
 
Impact of early termination of vegetation around paired eddy covariance towers in a divided winter wheat field (613158)
Eric Russell, Washington State University, Laboratory for Atmospheric Research, Pullman, WA, United States, Patrick O'Keeffe, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States, David Huggins, USDA-ARS Plains Area, Northwest Sustainable Agroecosystems Research, Pullman, WA, United States and Ian Leslie, USDA-ARS Plains Area, Northwest Sustainable Agroecosystems Research, Pullman, United States
 
Fine scale UAV based Albedo Mapping (614602)
Chad V Hanson1, Jovan Tadić2, Sebastien Biraud2 and Margaret S Torn3, (1)Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States, (2)Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States, (3)Berkeley Lab/UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
 
Profile and Flux Measurements of Methane and Other Greenhouse Gases in the Amazon Rainforest (620420)
Hella van Asperen1, Thorsten Warneke1, Alessandro C De Araujo2, Bruce Forsberg3, Leonardo Ramos de Oliveira4, Veber Moura4, Marta Sá4, Thiago de Lima Xavier4, Robson Azevedo de Oliveira4, Paulo Teixeira4, Leila Leal5, Arnoud Frumau6, Arjan Hensen6, Pim van den Bulk6, Danielle van Dinther6 and Justus Notholt1, (1)University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics, Bremen, Germany, (2)Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), Belem, PA, Brazil, (3)Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Manaus, Brazil, (4)Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Large Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA), Manaus, Brazil, (5)Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém, Brazil, (6)TNO, Utrecht, Netherlands
 
On quantifying the effect of spectroscopic correction error for an open-path gas analyzer on the upscaling of CO2 fluxes (623845)
Sungsik Cho1,2, Minseok Kang2, Kazuhito Ichii3, Joon Kim4, Jong-Hwan Lim5, Jung-Hwa Chun5, Chanwoo Park5, Hyun Seok Kim1,6, Seung-Hoon Lee1, Jongho Kim2 and Seungwon Sohn2, (1)Seoul National University, Interdisciplinary Program in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Seoul, South Korea, (2)National Center for AgroMeteorology, Seoul, South Korea, (3)Chiba University, Chiba, Japan, (4)Seoul National University, Department of Landscape Architecture & Rural Systems Engineering, Future Earth Program in Asia Center, Interdisciplinary Program in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Institute of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul, South Korea, (5)National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul, South Korea, (6)Seoul National University, Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul, South Korea
 
Radon as a Tracer of Soil Gas Transport Through Trees (626066)
Patrick Megonigal1, Paul Brewer1 and Karen L. Knee2, (1)Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, United States, (2)American University, Washington, DC, United States
 
Comparing In-situ Measurements of Evapotranspiration of Crop and Fallow Fields in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta of California in 2018 Using Surface Renewal and Eddy Covariance Methods (629824)
Jenae Clay1, Kyaw Tha Paw U1, Megan McAuliffe2, Megan Schmiedeler3, Mary Rose Mangan2 and Jean-Jacques Lambert1, (1)University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States, (2)University of California Davis, Land, Air and Water Resources, Davis, CA, United States, (3)University of California, Davis, Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, Davis, CA, United States
 
Comparison of Evapotranspiration from Four Field Methods and Five Remote Sensing Models for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Area of California (632140)
Kyaw Tha Paw U1, Jenae' M Clay2, Mary Rose Mangan1, Megan McAuliffe1, Megan Schmiedeler3 and Tao Zhang3, (1)University of California Davis, Land, Air and Water Resources, Davis, CA, United States, (2)University of California Davis, Land, Air, and Water Resources, Davis, CA, United States, (3)University of California, Davis, Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, Davis, CA, United States
 
Microbial Processes in the Stem Wood of Living Trees Affects Greenhouse Gas production and Nutrient Cycling (633949)
Paul Brewer1, Benton Neil Taylor1 and Patrick Megonigal2, (1)Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Edgewater, Edgewater, MD, United States, (2)Smithsonian Env Research Ctr, Edgewater, MD, United States
See more of: Biogeosciences