SM039
Uncertainty Quantification and Statistical Best Practices for Space Weather

Session ID#: 78947

Session Description:
Space weather events can negatively affect satellites, the electricity grid, satellite navigation systems and human health. Such consequences have caused space weather to be recognized as a hazard of national concern in numerous countries around the world. To help mitigate against such events a range of different models are used to nowcast and forecast space weather drivers and events. However, uncertainty of these forecasts are often not well quantified or reported, and forecast verification and model validation approaches are still being developed for different space weather applications. These simulations are key to our understanding of space weather, however any nowcast or forecast contains uncertainty. Appropriate steps need to be taken to quantify uncertainties for data-derived benchmarks and statistical analyses in the space weather domain. The goal of this session is to showcase new research in probabilistic forecasting, model sensitivity studies, ensemble modeling and highlight statistical best practices in the community.
Co-Organized:
  • SA - SPA-Aeronomy
  • SH - SPA-Solar and Heliospheric Physics
Index Terms:

7914 Engineering for hazard mitigation [SPACE WEATHER]
7924 Forecasting [SPACE WEATHER]
7959 Models [SPACE WEATHER]
7999 General or miscellaneous [SPACE WEATHER]


Primary Convener:  Sean Elvidge, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15, United Kingdom
Conveners:  Steven Morley, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States and Sophie A. Murray, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Primary Liaison:  Sean Elvidge, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15, United Kingdom
 
Quantifying the statistical distribution of extreme space climate and its variability within and across multiple solar cycles (491585)
Sandra C Chapman1, Nicholas W Watkins1 and Richard Bertram Horne2, (1)University of Warwick, Centre for Fusion, Space and Astrophysics, Department of Physics, Coventry, United Kingdom, (2)British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United Kingdom
 
Evaluation of total electron content forecasting using three ionosphere-thermosphere models (507776)
Olga P Verkhoglyadova1, Xing Meng1, Anthony J Mannucci2, Bruce Tsurutani3, Ja-Soon Shim4 and Ryan Michael McGranaghan5, (1)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)NASA, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, United States, (5)Atmospheric and Space Technology Research Associates, LLC, Boulder, CO, United States
 
The STONE Curve: A ROC-based model performance assessment tool (516241)
Michael Warren Liemohn1, Abigail Azari1, Natalia Y Ganushkina2 and Lutz Rastaetter3, (1)University of Michigan, Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, (2)University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, (3)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States
 
Verification of Space Weather Forecasts Issued by the UK Met Office (Invited) (545322)
Suzy Bingham1, Michael Sharpe1, David Jackson1, Sophie A. Murray2, Michael S Marsh1, Siegfried Gonzi1, Edmund Henley1, Krista Hammond1 and Mark Gibbs1, (1)Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom, (2)Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
 
Estimating the Relative Uncertainties of the GOES-NOP Magnetometer Measurements and the TS04 Magnetic Field Model from 2013-2018 (613615)
Sam Califf1, Paul T M Loto'aniu1, Robert J Redmon2 and Frederick J Rich3, (1)University of Colorado, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)Natl Geophysical Data Ctr, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States