H060
From Local to Global and back again:  making hydrologic modeling and prediction work across scales

Session ID#: 83817

Session Description:
Recent years have seen the rise of large-domain hydrologic prediction systems offering real-time flood forecasts everywhere and at local scales, based on coupled and uncoupled prediction approaches.  Yet techniques that served well for years in the local forecast context may not translate to continental or global applications, and the performance of large-domain predictions for local applications varies widely.  Our goal is to promote discussion on strategies for narrowing the gap between the local and large-domain system prediction quality.  We seek insights on local validation of large-domain forecasting, including both success and failure stories.  Also of interest: how to interpret or improve such forecasts though the application of techniques such as post-processing, data assimilation, model parameter estimation, ensembles, tailored forecast communication.  Lastly, we encourage contributions on potential applications of machine learning techniques for local, national and global hydrologic prediction.  This session supports the Hydrologic Ensemble Prediction Experiment (HEPEX; www.hepex.org). 
Index Terms:

1821 Floods [HYDROLOGY]
1840 Hydrometeorology [HYDROLOGY]
1922 Forecasting [INFORMATICS]
1942 Machine learning [INFORMATICS]


Primary Convener:  Andrew W Wood, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States
Conveners:  Nathalie Voisin, PNNL, Seattle, WA, United States, Yu Zhang, University of Texas at Arlington, Department of Civil Engineering, Arlington, TX, United States and Albrecht Weerts, Deltares, Operational Water Management, Delft, Netherlands
Primary Liaison:  Nathalie Voisin, PNNL, Seattle, WA, United States
 
ERA-Interim vs ERA-5 Hydrology Comparison (491319)
Jerom P.M. Aerts1, Rolf Hut2, Niels Drost3, Ben van Werkhoven3, Ronald van Haren3, Yifat Dzigan3, Jaro Camphuijsen3, Fakhereh Alidoost3, Inti Pelupessy3, Berend Weel3, Gijs van den Oord3, Stefan Verhoeven3, Laurene Bouaziz1,4, Willem van Verseveld5, Bert Jagers5, Fedor Baart5, Edwin Sutanudjaja6, Jannis M Hoch7, Lieke Anna Melsen8, Andrew Bennett9, Louise Arnal10,11, Fabrizio Fenicia12, Léonard Santos13, Emiliano Gelati14, Marco Dal Molin15, Wouter Knoben16, Shervan Gharari17, Caitlyn A Hall18, Eric Hutton19 and Nick Van De Giesen1, (1)Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft, Netherlands, (2)TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands, (3)Netherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, (4)Deltares, Department Catchment and Urban Hydrology, Delft, Netherlands, (5)Deltares, Delft, Netherlands, (6)Utrecht University, Physical Geography, Utrecht, Netherlands, (7)Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, (8)Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands, (9)University of Washington Seattle Campus, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seattle, WA, United States, (10)University of Reading, Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Reading, United Kingdom, (11)European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECWMF), Reading, United Kingdom, (12)CRP Gabriel Lippmann, Belvaux, Luxembourg, (13)Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden, (14)Institut Català de Ciències del Clima, Barcelona, Spain, (15)EAWAG Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Duebendorf, Switzerland, (16)University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8, United Kingdom, (17)University of Saskatchewan, Global Institute for Water Security, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, (18)Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States, (19)Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System, Boulder, CO, United States
 
Evaluating and Tailoring National Water Model Analysis for Estimating Freshwater Inflow into the Matagorda Bay (518232)
Md Arifur Rahman1, Mohammadvaghef Ghazvinian2, Yu Zhang3, Dong-Jun Seo2, Nelun Fernando4, Caimee Schoenbaechler5 and Ram Neupane5, (1)University of Texas at Arlington, Civil Engineering (Water Resources), Arlington, TX, United States, (2)University of Texas at Arlington, Civil Engineeing (Water Resources), Arlington, TX, United States, (3)University of Texas at Arlington, Department of Civil Engineering, Arlington, TX, United States, (4)Texas Water Development Board, Water Availability, Austin, TX, United States, (5)Texas Water Development Board, Bays & Estuaries, Austin, United States
 
From global to local river hydrodynamic predictions: can regional to continental models be locally relevant? (519877)
Walter Collischonn, Ayan Santos Fleischmann and Rodrigo C. D. Paiva, UFRGS Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Institute of Hydraulic Research, Porto Alegre, Brazil
 
Cryospheric process representation in local to national-extent hydrologic models (524447)
Jessica M Driscoll, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, United States, Theodore B Barnhart, U.S. Geological Survey, Helena, MT, United States, Graham A Sexstone, USGS Colorado Water Science Center Denver, Denver, CO, United States, John C Hammond, U.S. Geological Survey, Baltimore, United States, Ashley E Van Beusekom, USDA Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, San Juan, PR, United States and Katie Estridge Schneider, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, United States
 
Large-Scale Rainfall-Runoff Modeling using the Long Short-Term Memory Network (532618)
Frederik Kratzert1, Daniel Klotz1, Günter Klambauer1, Sepp Hochreiter1 and Grey Stephen Nearing2, (1)Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Machine Learning, Linz, Austria, (2)University of Alabama, Geological Sciences, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States
 
CHIP – Continental Hydrologic Intercomparison Project: A Conceptual Evaluation Framework for Large-Scale Hydrology Model Comparisons (549494)
Danielle Tijerina1, Laura E Condon2, Katelyn FitzGerald3, Aubrey L Dugger4, Mary Michael Forrester1, Wei Yu3, David Gochis5 and Reed M Maxwell1, (1)Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, United States, (2)University of Arizona, Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, Tucson, AZ, United States, (3)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States, (5)NCAR, Boulder, CO, United States
 
The effect of topographic processes on runoff simulation over the continental US (568228)
Jun Zhang, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, Laura E Condon, University of Arizona, Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, Tucson, AZ, United States, Hoang Tran, Colorado School of Mines, Geology and Geological Engineering, Golden, CO, United States; Colorado School of Mines, Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, Golden, CO, United States and Reed M Maxwell, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, United States
 
Short to Sub-seasonal Streamflow Forecasts for Reservoir Operations in India (574833)
Amar Deep Tiwari1, A. K. Sahai2, Andy Wood3 and Vimal Mishra1, (1)Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad, 382, India, (2)Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, India, (3)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States
 
Unlocking the Power of Global Models for Local Decision-Making with Hydrologic Modeling as a Service (Invited) (584675)
Jim Nelson1, Jorge Luis Sanchez2, Giovanni Bustamante3, Norm Jones4, Daniel P Ames4, Gustavious P Williams4, Michael Antonio Souffront Alcantara4 and Angelica Gutierrez-Magness5, (1)Brigham Young University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Provo, UT, United States, (2)Brigham Young University, Civil & Environmental Engineering, Provo, UT, United States, (3)Brigham Young University, Civil & Environmental, Provo, UT, United States, (4)Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States, (5)National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Water Prediction, Silver Spring, MD, United States
 
Estimation of historical monthly evapotranspiration rates for the conterminous U.S. (593791)
Meredith Reitz, U.S. Geological Survey, Hydrologic Remote Sensing Branch, Reston, VA, United States and Ward E Sanford, United States Geological Survey (USGS), Reston, VA, United States
 
Macro-scale Hydrologic Modeling for Depression-Dominated Cold Climate Regions (607194)
Mohsen Tahmasebi Nasab, Bucknell University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lewisburg, PA, United States and Xuefeng Chu, North Dakota State University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Fargo, ND, United States
 
Automated Multi-Domain Regression Testing of the WRF-Hydro Model with User-Specified Deviation Tolerance (608976)
Ryan Cabell1, James L McCreight1 and David Gochis1,2, (1)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)NCAR, Boulder, CO, United States
 
Toward Global Terrestrial Hydrology with Theory Guided Machine Learning (609447)
Jonathan M Frame, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States, Craig Pelissier, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Computational and Information Science & Technology Office, Greenbelt, MD, United States and Grey Stephen Nearing, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States
 
Identifying the minimum set of parameters for flood forecasting in Iowa using the HLM model (613524)
Nicolas Velasquez, Ricardo Mantilla, Witold F Krajewski and Felipe Quintero, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
 
Lessons learned in the application of the MRMS-FLASH system at scales ranging from the river reach to the Conterminous United States for Impact-based Flood Prediction (613761)
Humberto J Vergara, University of Oklahoma Norman Campus, Norman, OK, United States, Jonathan J Gourley, National Severe Storms Lab, Oklahoma City, OK, United States and Ami Arthur, The University of Oklahoma, Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, Norman, OK, United States
 
Development of watershed-based large-domain modeling to support monitoring, prediction and water management applications (626914)
Ridwan Siddique1, Andy Wood1, Naoki Mizukami1, Sudershan Gangrade2, Hongli Liu1, Bart Nijssen3, Andrew James Newman4, Katelyn FitzGerald1, Aubrey L Dugger5, Michael Barlage1, David Gochis4 and Martyn P Clark4, (1)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge, TN, United States, (3)University of Washington Seattle Campus, Seattle, WA, United States, (4)NCAR, Boulder, CO, United States, (5)University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
 
An Efficient Approach for Generating Large Scale Unstructured Computational Mesh for 2-D Flood Models (634569)
Venkatsundar Ramaswamy, Jupiter, Washington, DC, United States and Firas Saleh, Jupiter, New York, NY, United States
See more of: Hydrology