S036
Seismology Contributions: Earthquake Ground Motions and Engineering Seismology

Session ID#: 84506

Session Description:
Contributions on ground motion prediction, amplification, seismic hazards, engineering seismology, or near-surface interactions that do not naturally fall under the scope of any of the special sessions.
Index Terms:

7212 Earthquake ground motions and engineering seismology [SEISMOLOGY]
7299 General or miscellaneous [SEISMOLOGY]


Primary Convener:  German A Prieto, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Departamento de Geociencias, Bogota, Colombia
Convener:  Caroline Beghein, UCLA - Earth and Space Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Primary Liaison:  German A Prieto, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
 
Visualizing Data Saturation in Modeling Spatially Varying Ground Motions (492036)
Anirban Chakraborty, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan and Hiroyuki Goto, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
 
A Study on the Ground Motion Prediction Equation in the Korean peninsula Using Nonlinear Regression Analysis (495829)
Yoo Seong-hwa1, Junkyoung Kim2 and Sounghoon Wee1, (1)KIGAM Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon, South Korea, (2)Semyung University, Department of fire protection engineering, Chungchongbuk-Do, South Korea
 
Network Analysis to Characterize Seismic Ground Motion Spatial Variability: A Case study on the San Jacinto Seismic Array (495836)
Yixiao Sheng, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, Qingkai Kong, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States and Gregory C Beroza, Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, CA, United States
 
RUMShake: A pilot amplification study in western Puerto Rico (497764)
Preiser Brunat1, Elizabeth A Vanacore2, Thomas L Pratt3 and José A. Martínez-Cruzado1, (1)University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, Mayaguez, PR, United States, (2)Puerto Rico Seismic Network, Mayaguez, United States, (3)USGS Headquarters, Reston, VA, United States
 
Regional to teleseismic distance propagation of distinctive Love wave pulses in continental and oceanic environments (497786)
Takashi Furumura, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan and Brian L N Kennett, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
 
Site correction of high frequency ground motion simulation in Taiwan considering linear to nonlinear soil response (498016)
Jyun-Yan Huang, NCREE National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering of Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, Lin Che-Min, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, NARLabs, Taipei, Taiwan and Kuo-Liang Wen, National Central University, Institute of Geophysice, Taoyuan, Taiwan
 
Improved horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio inversion method based on earthquake motions and its ability to identify underground velocity structures (498565)
Mianshui Rong, Institute of Crustal Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China
 
The Seismic Safety Evaluation of the Site of Interest by the Causative Fault of the Gyeongju Earthquake with ML 5.8 on September 11, 2016 in South Korea (500997)
Hoseon Choi1, Junmo Yang2 and Myunghyun Noh1, (1)KINS Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon, South Korea, (2)KINS Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of (South)
 
Developing a 3-D crustal velocity model for central Oklahoma (503268)
Shuo Zhang, University of Texas at Dallas, Geoscience, Richardson, TX, United States and Hejun Zhu, University of Texas at Dallas, Geosicences, Richardson, United States
 
Spatial Variability of Nonergodic Site Response from Ambient Noise and Strong Ground Motion, with Application to Earthquake Early Warning (506986)
Grace Alexandra Parker and Annemarie Baltay, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, United States
 
Ground Motion from Mw 1.5 to 3.9 Aftershocks of the 2014 Mw 6.2 Jinggu Earthquake at Hypocentral Distances < 45 km in Yunnan, China (510815)
Mengyao Sun, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, Huiyu Zhu, USTC University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China, Jie Zhang, USTC, China, Hefei, Anhui, China, Haohuan Fu, Tsinghua University, Wuxi National Supercomputer Center, Beijing, China and Xiao Tian, East China University of Technology, Nanchang, China
 
Seismic Monitoring of Super High-Rise Buildings Using Ambient Noise Interferometry (513515)
Xiaoyang Wu1, Zhen Guo1, Lanbo Liu2 and Yongshun John Chen1, (1)Southern University of Science and Technology, Department of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shenzhen, China, (2)University of Connecticut, Geosciences, Storrs, CT, United States
 
Geomorphic Unit Wise Site Response Analysis in Bangladesh (514090)
Sadia Marium Rinty, University of Dhaka, Department of Disaster Science & Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh and Dewan Mohammad Enamul Haque, University of Dhaka, Department of Disaster Science and Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh
 
Mapping Near-Surface Rigidity Structure using Co-located Pressure and Seismic Stations from the EarthScope Transportable Array (514220)
Jiong Wang, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States and Toshiro Tanimoto, Univ of Calif., Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
 
Best practice and quality assessment procedures for site characterization at seismic station: an European initiative (515526)
Giovanna Cultrera1, Giuseppe Di Giulio2, Cécile Cornou3, Pierre-yves Bard3 and Bilal Al Tfaily3, (1)Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy, (2)Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, L'Aquila, Italy, (3)Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IRD, IFSTTAR, ISTerre, Grenoble, France
 
Moment and energy magnitudes: diversity of views on earthquake shaking potential and earthquake statistics (516134)
Matteo Picozzi1, Dino Bindi2, Daniele Spallarossa3, Adrien Oth4, Domenico Di Giacomo5 and Aldo Zollo1, (1)University of Naples Federico II, Department of Physics, Naples, Italy, (2)Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Potsdam, Germany, (3)University of Genoa, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra dell'Ambiente e della Vita, Genoa, Italy, (4)European Center for Geodynamics and Seismology, L-7256 Walferdange, Luxembourg, (5)International Seismological Centre (ISC), Thatcham, United Kingdom
 
Development of the Ground Motion Prediction Equation for Horizontal PGD in Taiwan (517129)
Chih Hsuan Sung, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States and Jyun-Yan Huang, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan
 
A machine-learning model to predict surface-wave amplification in sedimentary basins (518138)
Quentin Brissaud, California Institute of Technology, Seismological Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States and Victor C. Tsai, Brown University, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Providence, United States
 
Seismic monitoring of a 14-story building using continuously recorded earthquake and ambient vibration data (522322)
Nathalia Jaimes1, German A Prieto1 and Carlos Rodriguez2, (1)Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Departamento de Geociencias, Bogota, Colombia, (2)Universidad ECCI, Bogota, Colombia
 
Site Response Characterization of the San Gabriel, Chino, and San Bernardino Basins from Ambient Noise Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio Measurements (525027)
Anisha D Tyagi1, Sam Gurley, Margaret Grenier3, Rachel Kreuziger3 and Jascha Polet1, (1)California State Polytechnic University Pomona, Pomona, CA, United States, (2)California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, Pomona, CA, United States
 
Sensitivity Analysis of the Inter-frequency Correlation of Near-source Ground Motions to the Correlation Structure between Earthquake Source Parameters (536634)
Seok Goo Song, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon, South Korea and Mathieu Causse, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
 
Ground motion evaluation along the Chilean subduction zone: variability and possible causes (542661)
Carlos Herrera1, John F Cassidy2, Stan E Dosso1, Nicolás Bastías3 and Tuna Onur4, (1)University of Victoria, School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Victoria, BC, Canada, (2)Geological Survey of Canada Sidney, Sidney, BC, Canada, (3)Gensis Ingeniería, Concepción, Chile, (4)OSC, Victoria, BC, Canada
 
Testing advanced seismological methods towards a better understanding of the built environment response to earthquakes in New Zealand (564057)
Caroline Francois-Holden1, AnnaMaria Sklodowska2 and Philippe Gueguen2, (1)GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, (2)ISTerre Institute of Earth Sciences, Saint Martin d'Hères, France
 
Shallow sedimentary structure across northeast China and its implication for estimating ground-motion amplification (567088)
Haichao Chen, China University of Petroleum at Beijing, Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, and State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, Beijing, China, Fenglin Niu, Rice University, Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Houston, TX, United States and Guoliang Li, 1State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, and Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum at Beijing, Beijing, China, Beijing, China
 
Estimation of Spectral Decay Parameters in the Southern Korean Peninsula (571535)
Byeong Seok Ahn1, Hyun Jae Yoo1 and Tae-Seob Kang2, (1)Pukyong National University, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Busan, South Korea, (2)Pukyong National University, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Busan, Korea, Republic of (South)
 
Investigation on site character proxy of the marine site soil condition (571561)
Yanju Peng1,2, Yuejun Lyu2, Yi Fang2 and Shuai Huang2, (1)University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States, (2)Institute of Crustal Dynamic, China Earthquake Administration, Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China
 
The Shallow Subsurface as an Amplification Factor During Historic Earthquakes (571912)
Yaniv Darvasi, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel and Amotz Agnon, Hebrew University, Institute of Earth Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel
 
Exploring the Physics and Uncertainties in Spatial Cross-Correlation Models for Ground Motion Intensity Measures (574183)
Henning Lilienkamp1,2, Sebastian Specht1,2, Graeme Weatherill1 and Fabrice Cotton1,2, (1)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (2)University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
 
Strong motion simulation using Fourier phase information of weak motion records: an application to the 2018 Osaka, Japan, earthquake (577344)
Yosuke Nagasaka and Atsushi Nozu, Port and Airport Research Institute, Kanagawa, Japan
 
Site amplification obtained by aftershock and microtremor array observations around the source area of the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi earthquake, Japan (585177)
Masayuki Yoshimi1, Kaori Iiyama2, Hitoshi Morikawa2 and Hiroyuki Goto3, (1)Geological Survey of Japan, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, (2)Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan, (3)Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
 
Site-Specific Characterization of Earthquake Ground Motions: Papua New Guinea Case Study (594918)
Emrah Yenier1, Mark Novakovic1, Andrew Hovey2 and Joseph Quinn3, (1)Nanometrics Inc, Kanata, ON, Canada, (2)Klohn Crippen Berger, Brisbane, Australia, (3)Klohn Crippen Berger, York, United Kingdom
 
Seismic Response of Cook Inlet Sedimentary Basin, Southern Alaska (594951)
Kyle Smith and Carl Tape, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States
 
Towards a deep understanding of the seismic response of the Mexico City Valley: A study based on diverse spectral ratios and numerical simulations (596956)
Francisco J Sanchez-Sesma1, Hugo Cruz-Jiménez2, Adrian Ruelas3, Mario A. Ortega-Rodríguez Mr.2, Kristel C. Meza-Fajardo Dr.4, Fumiaki Nagashima5, Sunyoung Park6, Mario Ordaz7 and Javier Francisco Lermo8, (1)National Autonomous University of Mexico, Institute of Engineering, Ciudad DE Armería, Mexico, (2)National Autonomous University of Mexico, Institute of Engineering, Coyoacan, CDMX, Mexico, (3)Catedrático CONACYT at Institute of Engineering-UNAM, Coyoacan, CDMX, Mexico, (4)Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Risk and Prevention Division, Orleans, France, (5)Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, (6)California Institute of Technology, Seismological Laboratory, Pasadena, MA, United States, (7)National Autonumous University of Mexico; Institute of Engineering, Cdmx, Mexico, (8)National Autonomous University of Mexico, Institute of Engineering, Cdmx, Mexico
 
Seismic characterization of the Seattle fault deformation front: hazard implications for downtown Seattle, Washington (609360)
Stephen Slivicki, IRIS, River Falls, WI, United States and Lee M Liberty, Boise State Univ, Boise, ID, United States
 
The SCEC Broadband Platform: Open-Source Software for Strong Ground Motion Simulation and Validation (613079)
Fabio Silva, Philip J Maechling, Christine A. Goulet and Scott Callaghan, Southern California Earthquake Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
 
A new index to integrate amplitude and duration of earthquake motions (613753)
Huseyin S Kuyuk, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
 
Recipe for Predicting Strong Ground Motion on the SCEC Broadband Platform (623226)
Hiroe Miyake1, Arben Pitarka2, Asako Iwaki3, Nobuyuki Morikawa3, Takahiro Maeda3 and Hiroyuki Fujiwara3, (1)The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, (2)Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United States, (3)National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Tsukuba, Japan
 
Broadband Ground Motion from 3D Numerical Simulation with Empirical Ground-Motion Characteristics (624761)
Asako Iwaki1, Hiroyuki Fujiwara2 and Shigeki Senna2, (1)National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan, (2)National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Tsukuba, Japan
 
Assessing Site Response Complexity Using Single Station HVSR: Mexico City Case Study (626635)
Marshall Pontrelli, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States and Laurie G Baise, Tufts University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Medford, MA, United States
 
Trial simulation for the severe strong ground motion during the 2018 Hokkaido Iburi, Japan, Earthquake (628705)
Nobuo Takai1, Michiko Shigefuji2 and Tsutomu Sasatani1, (1)Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, (2)Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
 
Correction for Site Effects of Earthquake Ground Motions Using Horizontal-to-vertical Spectral Ratio of Ambient Noise (628773)
Tae-Seob Kang1, Byeong Seok Ahn2 and Hyun Jae Yoo2, (1)Pukyong National University, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Busan, Korea, Republic of (South), (2)Pukyong National University, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Busan, South Korea
 
Seismic response change of a sand soil after strong motion, revealed by a transmission laboratory experiment (630993)
Tsurugi Kakutani1, Hironori Kawakata2 and Shiro Hirano1, (1)Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan, (2)Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu Shiga, Japan
 
Ground Motion Differences and Damage in Juchitan de Zaragoza, Oaxaca from the 2017 Tehuantepec, Mexico (M8.2) Earthquake from a Temporary Seismic Network (633555)
Aaron A Velasco1, Solymar Ayala Cortez2, Hector Gonzalez-Huizar2 and Allen L Husker3, (1)University of Texas at El Paso, Geological Sciences, El Paso, TX, United States, (2)University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, United States, (3)U.N.A.M., Mexico City, Mexico
See more of: Seismology
<< Previous Session Proposal | Next Session Proposal >>