H188-01
What is the role of hydrological science in the age of machine learning?

Tuesday, 15 December 2020: 19:00
Virtual
Grey Stephen Nearing1, Frederik Kratzert2, Alden Keefe Sampson3, Craig Pelissier4, Daniel Klotz2, Cristina Prieto5, Jonathan M Frame6 and Hoshin Gupta7, (1)Natel Energy Inc, Upstream Tech, Alameda, CA, United States, (2)Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Machine Learning, Linz, Austria, (3)Upstream Tech, Alameda, CA, United States, (4)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Computational and Information Science & Technology Office, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (5)University of Cantabria, Environmental Hydraulics Institute "IH Cantabria", Santander, Spain, (6)California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA, United States, (7)Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
Abstract:
Recent experiments applying deep learning to rainfall-runoff simulation indicate that there is significantly more information in large-scale hydrological data sets than hydrologists have been able to translate into theory or models. We argue that these results challenge certain `sacred cows' in the surface hydrology community, and may be a bellwether for the discipline as a whole. While there is growing interest in machine learning in the hydrological sciences community, in many ways our community still holds deeply subjective and non-evidence-based preferences for process understanding that has historically not translated into accurate theory, models, or predictions. We suggest that, due to the perennial failure in the surface hydrology community to develop scale-relevant theories, one possible future is a discipline based primarily in machine learning and other AI methods, with a more limited role for what we currently recognize as hydrological science. We do not want this to happen and suggest a `grand challenge' for the community to work toward demonstrating where and when hydrological theory provides information in a world dominated by big data.