EP009-05
Coupled limits to silicate, carbonate, and sulfide weathering in metasediments drives release of CO2 with erosion: Constrains from southern Taiwan.

Monday, 7 December 2020: 17:46
Virtual
Aaron Bufe, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, Niels Hovius, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, Robert Emberson, Universities Space Research Association, Greenbelt, MD, United States, Jeremy K Caves Rugenstein, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, The Land in the Earth System, Hamburg, Germany, Albert Galy, CRPG Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France, Hima J Hassenruck-Gudipati, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States and Jui-Ming Chang, Department of Geoscience, National Taiwan University, Department of Geosciences, Taipei, Taiwan
Abstract:
The supply of fresh minerals to Earth’s surface by erosion is thought to modulate global climate by removing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) through silicate weathering. In turn, weathering of accessory carbonate and sulphide minerals is a geologically-relevant CO2 source, which may dampen or reverse the effect of silicate weathering on climate. Although these weathering pathways commonly operate side by side, we lack mechanistic and quantitative constraints on their co-evolution across erosion-rate gradients. Using stream-water chemistry across a 3 order-of-magnitude erosion-rate gradient in shales and sandstones of southern Taiwan, here, we demonstrate that silicate, sulphide, and carbonate weathering are linked: Increasing sulphide oxidation generates sulfuric acid and boosts carbonate solubility whereas silicate weathering kinetics remain constant or even decline, likely due to buffering of the pH by carbonates. On timescales shorter than marine sulphide compensation, CO2 emission rates from weathering in rapidly-eroding terrain are more than twice the CO2 sequestration rates in slow-eroding terrain. On longer timescales, CO2 emissions are compensated, but CO2 sequestration rates do not increase with erosion, in contrast to assumptions in carbon cycle models. We posit that these patterns are broadly applicable to many Cenozoic mountain ranges that expose dominantly siliciclastic metasediments.