A226-0001
Understanding the prediction and structure of Indian monsoon low-pressure systems in the Subseasonal-to-Seasonal prediction project
Abstract:
The results show that all S2S models under-simulate the frequency of LPSs. Their transits are represented by all models, but large biases are observed in the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration (CMA), Environment and Climate Change Canada and Hydrometeorological Centre of Russia (HMCR) models. The CMA model exhibits the highest position error and the intensity of LPSs is overestimated by most models. The CMA, National Centers for Environmental Prediction and UK Met Office models have the best ensemble spread-error relationship for the position and intensity, whereas the HMCR model has the worst. In general, all models simulate large-scale features of LPSs. Except the HMCR model, all models simulate the warm-over-cold thermal structure of LPSs. In all models, the vertical structure of relative vorticity is shallower and weaker than in ERA-I. In most models, LPS composites feature drier middle and upper troposphere than in ERA-I.