B008-10
Practical Approaches for Normalizing Directional Solar-induced Fluorescence at both red and far-red bands

Monday, 7 December 2020: 07:36
Virtual
Dalei Hao1, Yelu Zeng2, Han Qiu3, Khelvi Biriukova4, Marco Celesti4, Mirco Migliavacca5, Micol Rossini4, Ghassem Asrar6,7 and Min Chen3, (1)Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Richland, WA, United States, (2)Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, MD, United States, (3)Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Global Change Research Institute, Richland, WA, United States, (4)University of Milano - Bicocca, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Milan, Italy, (5)Max-Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Jena, Germany, (6)Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States, (7)Universities Space Research Association Columbia, Columbia, WA, United States
Abstract:
Recent advances in remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) have improved our capabilities of monitoring large-scale terrestrial photosynthesis. However, SIF observations are subject to directional effects which can lead to considerable uncertainties in various applications. Practical approaches for normalizing off-nadir SIF observations (at both red and far-red bands) to nadir view have not been well studied. Here we developed two practical and physically-based approaches for removing the directional effects of anisotropic SIF observations at both red and far-red bands: one is based on near-infrared or red reflectance of vegetation (NIRv and Redv), and the other is based on the kernel-driven model with multi-angular SIF measurements. The first approach uses surface reflectance and the second approach leverages multi-angular SIF measurements. The performance of the two approaches was evaluated using a dataset of multi-angular measurements of SIF and reflectance collected with a high-resolution field spectrometer for different plant canopies. Results show that the relative mean absolute errors between the normalized nadir SIF and the observed SIF at nadir decrease by 3-6% (far-red) and 6-8% (red) for the first approach, and by 7-13% and 6-11% for the second approach, compared to original data, respectively. The effectiveness and simplicity of our proposed approaches provide great potentials to develop long-term and consistent SIF data records with minimized directional effects and further improve global estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP).