GC064-01
MultiSector Influences on Urban Water Supply Across the United States

Thursday, 10 December 2020: 17:30
Virtual
Sean William Donald Turner1, Kristian Nelson2, Jennie Rice1, Chris R Vernon3, Ryan McManamay4, Landon Marston5 and Kerim Dickson6, (1)Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States, (2)Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Hydrology Group, Richland, WA, United States, (3)Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Global Change Research Institute, Richland, WA, United States, (4)Baylor University, Environmental Science, Waco, TX, United States, (5)Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, IL, United States, (6)Carnegie Mellon University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Abstract:
In the United States, and globally, the public has opposed and often defeated proposed investments in water reuse facilities for augmenting drinking water supplies. Opposition to water reuse stems partly from the notion that source water is pristine, not to be contaminated or degraded by human activity. The reality is that many cities throughout the United States draw water from highly complex watershed systems, wherein the activities of agriculture, resource extraction, power generation, and human development interact with and degrade source water. Previous research has shown that knowledge of these activities and their influence on source water can shift public attitudes on water reuse—highlighting a key role for science to provide this information. In this work we combine spatial polygons of United States urban drinking water supply catchments with geospatial layers detailing the presence of human activity—namely croplands, power plants, economic sectors, and human settlements. These data are used to characterize and cluster more than 200 United States cities according to concentrations of degraded flow reaching their municipal water supply intakes. Results highlight an enormous variety in watershed complexity—ranging from cities relying on pristine source water, to cases where almost all of the flow reaching drinking water intakes during dry months is discharge from upstream wastewater treatment facilities. We rank cities according to the level of upstream impact on water, and demonstrate how geographical factors explain many of differences in watershed complexity across the country.
In the United States, and globally, the public has opposed and often defeated proposed investments in water reuse facilities for augmenting drinking water supplies. Opposition to water reuse stems partly from the notion that source water is pristine, not to be contaminated or degraded by human activity. The reality is that many cities throughout the United States draw water from highly complex watershed systems, wherein the activities of agriculture, resource extraction, power generation, and human development interact with and degrade source water. Previous research has shown that knowledge of these activities and their influence on source water can shift public attitudes on water reuse—highlighting a key role for science to provide this information. In this work we combine spatial polygons of United States urban drinking water supply catchments with geospatial layers detailing the presence of human activity—namely croplands, power plants, economic sectors, and human settlements. These data are used to characterize and cluster more than 200 United States cities according to concentrations of degraded flow reaching their municipal water supply intakes. Results highlight an enormous variety in watershed complexity—ranging from cities relying on pristine source water, to cases where almost all of the flow reaching drinking water intakes during dry months is discharge from upstream wastewater treatment facilities. We rank cities according to the level of upstream impact on water, and demonstrate how geographical factors explain many of differences in watershed complexity across the country.