A221-0006
Characterizing OCO-2 XCO2 Variability Across Land-Ocean Boundaries in the Continental United States

Wednesday, 16 December 2020
Poster
Kayla Alexis Mitchell, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States, Scott Doney, University of Virginia, Department of Environmental Sciences, Charlottesville, VA, United States and Gretchen Keppel-Aleks, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
Abstract:
Carbon monitoring and mitigation as well as Earth system modeling require surface CO2 fluxes to be accurately and robustly quantified. Atmospheric inversion studies that aim to quantify surface CO2 fluxes call for descriptions of atmosphere CO2 variations, which are becoming increasingly documented by satellite CO2 observations. NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) provides global coverage of total column-averaged CO2 measurements (XCO2), which are less sensitive to vertical mixing and exchange with the free troposphere than surface CO2 data. Differences between CO2 variability in continental and marine air have been observed and quantified by surface measurement networks, but less is known about this transition throughout the total air column. Using OCO-2 XCO2, we investigate land-ocean boundaries to better understand the transition between continental air mass XCO2 and background maritime air mass XCO2. Our research characterizes spatial and temporal variability in XCO2 across these land-ocean atmospheric boundaries along the east and west coastlines of the continental United States. The analysis is split into one-degree latitudinal bands to compare onshore to offshore XCO2 populations. A series of anomalies are computed to investigate XCO2 variability over a range of spatial gradients and timescales from seasonal to synoptic. Preliminary findings indicate differences in spatial means, synoptic variability, and seasonal cycle amplitude and phasing between land and ocean XCO2 populations that show a latitudinal dependence. Differences in XCO2 variance imparted by pointing mode (glint & nadir) are significant. The impact of instrument and algorithm noise as well as small spatial-scale geophysical signals are evaluated by averaging adjacent retrievals along-orbit and found to impart a substantial fraction of the variability in XCO2 data analyzed. Further work can focus on attributing the observed variability to real signals either from surface fluxes and atmospheric transport or residual bias in OCO-2 soundings. This analysis could help identify real carbon cycle and atmosphere-driven geophysical variation as well as measurement biases over land and ocean, which have different surface reflectance properties, and improve satellite retrieval techniques.