A150-0006
Causes of model biases in simulating inorganic aerosol composition during KORUS-AQ and implications for the estimate of transboundary pollution

Monday, 14 December 2020
Poster
Katherine Travis1, James H Crawford1, Carolyn Jordan2, Benjamin Nault3, Gangwoong Lee4, Hwajin Kim5, Seogju Cho6, Hye Jung Shin7, Taehyoung Lee8, James Szykman9, Isobel J Simpson10, Jung-Hun Woo11, Younha Kim11 and Donald Ray Blake10, (1)NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, United States, (2)NASA Langley, Hampton, United States, (3)Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, CA, United States, (4)Hankuk Univ of Foreign Studies, Yongin, Korea, Republic of (South), (5)KIST, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), (6)Seoul Research Institute of Public Health and Environment, Seoul, South Korea, (7)NIER National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon, Korea, Republic of (South), (8)Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Environmental Science, Yongin, South Korea, (9)US EPA, ORD, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Hampton, VA, United States, (10)University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States, (11)Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea
Abstract:
East Asia is a region of increasing economic growth which has led to severe PM2.5 pollution in urban areas. The joint NASA-NIER Korea-United States Air Quality (KORUS-AQ) field campaign in May-June 2016 provided an extensive dataset of ground, airborne, and remote sensing observations to test model simulations of PM2.5 pollution transport and potential control measures. During KORUS-AQ, a period of haze was observed in which PM2.5 rapidly increased to the highest levels observed during the campaign. This increase is associated with increasing inorganic aerosol. While a portion of this increase is due to long-range transport, there is observational evidence that aerosol formation from local precursors was also enhanced. This suggests that domestic policy measures could have a greater than expected influence on controlling PM2.5. However, models have difficulty reproducing PM2.5 levels, particularly the composition of secondary inorganic aerosol. Models generally underestimate sulfate and overestimate nitrate and fail to represent the peak levels of PM2.5 during haze events. These biases have been chiefly attributed to errors in chemical mechanisms and model meteorology, not issues with underlying emissions inventories. Here, we use observations from KORUS-AQ interpreted by the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model to improve the model’s ability to reproduce secondary inorganic aerosol concentrations during the campaign and explore mechanisms to improve model biases during the haze event. We assess the fraction of inorganic aerosol from the improved model simulation that results from transboundary transport during KORUS-AQ and test the model sensitivity to potential emission reduction measures that could improve air quality in Seoul during different meteorological periods including haze episodes.