GC112-09
The Potential of Different Cover Crop Systems in Mitigating Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The Potential of Different Cover Crop Systems in Mitigating Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Wednesday, 16 December 2020: 04:32
Virtual
Abstract:
Cultivated lands that support high productivity have the potential to produce a large amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Extensive research shows that different land management practices have various effects on three major GHGs: CO2, CH4, and N2O. For example, CO2 could be released through soil disturbance events and N2O emissions could be stimulated under excessive nitrogen fertilizer inputs. Cover crop establishment is considered one of the sustainable land management strategies under warm and humid environmental conditions. To investigate which cover crop performs best in minimizing GHG emissions, in this study, we compared trace gas fluxes (CO2, N2O and CH4) from a corn field with three cover crop systems: crimson clover (CC); cereal rye (CR); white clover (WC) and no cover crop system (traditional, Tr) in 2018. Observational data were collected during growing season once a week from Watkinsville, GA, USA. In 2018, mean CO2 flux from CC, CR, WC and Tr was 4.01, 3.91, 5.77, 2.42 μmol m-2 sec-1, respectively. Mean N2O flux from CC, CR, WC and Tr was 0.596, 0.139, 0.706, 0.588 μmolN m-2 hr-1, respectively. Highest fluxes of both CO2 and N2O were from the WC plots, especially at the late growing season, due most likely to the decomposition of added white clover residue. The soils served as a sink for CH4, with a mean flux from CC, CR, WC and Tr being -1.10, -0.875, -1.05 and -0.627 μmol m-2 hr-1, respectively. Tr system was the smallest CH4 sink compared to the other three cover crop systems. Among the three cover crop systems, CC was the largest CH4 sink, although the three cover crop systems did not differ significantly. Comparing four systems with a net CO2e, mitigation effects from CH4 sink, soil carbon sequestration, reduced fertilizer and herbicide application are still not capable of counteracting higher CO2 and N2O emissions generated in the field. The net CO2e from CC, CR, WC and Tr was 2184.80, 2129.10, 3161.30 and 1307.75 kg CO2e ha-1, respectively.