OS007-02
Evolution of Global Sea-level Rise Projections for the 21st Century and their Incorporation in Local and Regional Assessments

Monday, 7 December 2020: 20:38
Virtual
Andra Jenn Garner1, Jeremy L Weiss2, Adam Parris3, Robert E Kopp4, Radley M Horton5, Jonathan T Overpeck6, Fangyi Tan7, Christabel Wan Jie Tan7, Sarah E Sosa8 and Benjamin Peter Horton9, (1)Rowan University, Environmental Science, Glassboro, NJ, United States, (2)University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, (3)CUNY Brooklyn College, Science and Resilience Institute at Jamaica Bay, Brooklyn, NY, United States, (4)Rutgers University New Brunswick, Institute of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ, United States, (5)Columbia University, New York, NY, United States, (6)University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States, (7)Nanyang Technological University, Asian School of the Environment, Singapore, Singapore, (8)Rowan University, Biological Sciences, Glassboro, NJ, United States, (9)Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Abstract:
The potential effect of global warming on sea level and the possible impacts of sea-level rise on ecosystems, infrastructure, and society began to be realized nearly four decades ago, leading to the first global sea-level rise projections in the early 1980s. Subsequent projections have helped to improve understanding of the processes driving sea-level rise and develop new methods of projecting future sea-level rise. Despite these advances, future sea-level rise remains deeply uncertain at both global and regional scales. To facilitate understanding of the historical development of global sea-level rise projections and provide context for interpreting the current state of the art, we present an update to our database of 21st century global sea-level rise projections (Garner et al., 2018). Our results show that the range of projected global sea-level rise has varied greatly over time. Upper projections of sea-level rise from individual studies are generally higher than upper projections from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, potentially due to differing percentile bounds, or a pre-disposition of consensus-based approaches toward relatively conservative outcomes.

We also present a new database of sea-level rise assessment documents that are used at the local scale from two distinct regions: North America and Asia. Results of this work aim to help inform both the scientific and decision-making communities, by analyzing differences in the scientific approaches used to develop local sea-level rise assessments across regions, and highlighting how scientific knowledge can and should guide policy-making and communication between academic and decision-making sectors.