NH013-0001
How Alaska’s Barry Arm Can Help Us Prepare for Climate Change Hazards

Wednesday, 9 December 2020
Poster
Bretwood M Higman1, Chad Briggs2, Jeffrey A. Coe3, Chunli Dai4, Anja Dufresne5, Jeffrey Todd Freymueller6, Marten Geertsema7, Peter J Haeussler8, Mylene Fabienne Jacquemart9, Michele N Koppes10, Anna K Liljedahl11, Patrick J Lynett12, Dmitry Nicolsky13, Lauren N Schaefer14, Melissa Karine Ward Jones11, Robert Weiss15, Michael Edwin West16 and Gabriel J Wolken17,18, (1)Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States, (2)University of Alaska Anchorage, College of Business & Public Policy, Anchorage, AK, United States, (3)US Geological Survey, Denver, CO, United States, (4)Ohio State University Main Campus, Division of Geodetic Science, School of Earth Sciences, Columbus, OH, United States, (5)RWTH-Aachen University, Ingenieurgeologie und Hydrogeologie, Aachen, Germany, (6)Michigan State University, Earth and Environmental Sciences, East Lansing, MI, United States, (7)FLNRO, Prince George, BC, Canada, (8)USGS, Anchorage, AK, United States, (9)WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos Dorf, Switzerland, (10)University of British Columbia, Geography, Vancouver, Canada, (11)Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA, United States, (12)University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (13)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (14)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, CO, United States, (15)Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States, (16)Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (17)University of Alaska Fairbanks, International Arctic Research Center, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (18)Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys, Fairbanks, AK, United States
Abstract:
A slope at Barry Arm, in Alaska’s Prince William Sound, is deforming at a varying rate up to tens of meters per year above a retreating glacier and deep fjord that is a popular recreational destination. If the estimated 500 million cubic meters of unstable material on this slope were to fail catastrophically, the impact of the landslide with the ocean would produce a tsunami that would not only endanger those in its immediate vicinity, but likely also those in more distant areas such as the port of Whittier, 50 km away. The discovery of this threat was happenstance, and the response so far has been cobbled together from over a dozen existing grants and programs. Remotely sensed imagery could have revealed this hazard a decade ago, but nobody was looking, highlighting our lack of coordination and preparedness for this growing hazard driven by climate change. As glaciers retreat, they can simultaneously destabilize mountain slopes and expose deep waters below, creating the potential for destructive tsunamis. The settings where this risk might occur are easily identified, but more difficult to assess and monitor. Unlike for volcanoes, active faults, landslides, and tectonic tsunamis, the US has conducted no systematic assessment of tsunamis generated by subaerial landslides, nor has the US established methods for monitoring or issuing warnings for such tsunamis. The U.S. National Tsunami Warning Center relies on seismic signals and sea-level measurements to issue warnings; however, landslides are more difficult to detect than earthquakes, and the resultant tsunamis often would reach vulnerable populations and infrastructure before water level gages could help estimate the magnitude of the tsunami. Also, integrating precursory motion and other clues of an impending slope failure into a tsunami warning system has only been done outside the US (e.g Norway: Blikra et al., 2012). Barry Arm is a dramatic case study highlighting these challenges and may provide a model for mitigating the threat of tsunamis generated by subaerial landslides enabled by glacial retreat elsewhere.