H112-0020
The quest for understanding the organisational principles of hyporheic exchange flow and biogeochemical cycling across scales

Friday, 11 December 2020
Poster
Stefan Krause1, Benjamin W Abbott2, Viktor A Baranov3, Susana Bernal4, Phillip Blaen5, Thibault Datry6, Jennifer Drummond5, Jan H Fleckenstein7, Jesus D Gomez-Velez8, David M Hannah1, Julia LA Knapp9, Marie J Kurz10, Joerg Lewandowski11, Eugenia Martí Roca4, Clara Mendoza-Lera12, Alexander Milner5, Aaron Ian Packman13, Gilles Pinay14, Adam S Ward15 and Jay P Zarnetske16, (1)University of Birmingham, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Birmingham, B15, United Kingdom, (2)Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States, (3)Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany, (4)CEAB-CSIC, Girona, Spain, (5)University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, (6)INRAE Lyon, Villeurbanne Cedex, France, (7)UFZ, Leipzig, Germany, (8)Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, (9)University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, (10)Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, (11)Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany, (12)CEAB, Barcelona, Spain, (13)Northwestern Univeristy, Evanston, IL, United States, (14)IRSTEA Lyon, RiverLy, Villeurbanne Cedex, France, (15)Indiana University, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Bloomington, IN, United States, (16)Michigan State University, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, East Lansing, MI, United States
Abstract:
Hyporheic zones increase freshwater ecosystem resilience to hydrological extremes and global environmental change. However, current conceptualisation of hyporheic exchange fluxes, residence time distributions and associated biogeochemical cycling in streambed sediments do not fully encompass the complexity of streams and rivers that are observed in the field. Specifically, the coupled transport and reactivity along groundwater and surface water flow paths, the role of autochthonous organic matter in the streambed, and the feedbacks between ecological processes are not included presently in conceptual models. While simplification is justifiable and necessary for scaling, the exclusion of important hyporheic processes from our conceptualizations can lead to erroneous conclusions, limiting our understanding and management of hyporheic zones. This is particularly true at the landscape scale, where organisational principles that influence spatial patterns and temporal dynamics of the drivers and controls of hyporheic exchange flow and biogeochemical cycling along a catchment continuum are largely unknown.

We here synthesise the results of recent field experimental and modelling studies to identify the most important drivers and controls of hyporheic exchange flow and biogeochemical cycling. Our analysis is integrating results from a wide range of case studies that in their complexity challenge current paradigms and conceptual model frameworks. We discuss the interactions of local-to-regional hydrological, geomorphological, and ecological controls of hyporheic zone functioning in the landscape context. Based on this, we develop a conceptual model of the overarching landscape organizational principles of hyporheic exchange flow and biogeochemical cycling from reach to catchment scale to direct future river research and watershed management.