A152-0016
Sensitivity of the Southern Hemisphere Atmospheric Jet Response to Antarctic Ozone Depletion: Prescribed versus Interactive Chemistry

Monday, 14 December 2020
Poster
Sabine Haase1, Jaika Fricke1, Tim Kruschke2, Sebastian Wahl1 and Katja Matthes1, (1)GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany, (2)SMHI - Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden
Abstract:
Southern hemisphere lower stratospheric ozone depletion has been shown to lead to a poleward shift of the tropospheric jet stream during austral summer, influencing surface atmosphere and ocean conditions. The characteristics of stratospheric and tropospheric responses to ozone depletion, however, differ among climate models depending on the representation of ozone in the models.

The most accurate way to represent ozone in a model is to calculate it interactively. However, due to computational costs, the more common way is to prescribe ozone from observations or calculated model fields. Here, we investigate the difference between an interactive and a specified chemistry version of the same atmospheric model in a fully-coupled setup using a 9-member chemistry-climate model ensemble. In the specified chemistry version of the model the ozone fields are prescribed using the output from the interactive chemistry model version. We use daily-resolved ozone fields in the specified chemistry simulations to achieve a good comparability between the ozone forcing with and without interactive chemistry. We find that although the short-wave heating rate trend in response to ozone depletion is the same in the different chemistry settings, the interactive chemistry ensemble shows a stronger trend in polar cap stratospheric and circumpolar stratospheric zonal mean zonal winds as compared to the specified chemistry ensemble. This difference between interactive and specified chemistry in the stratospheric response to ozone depletion also affects the tropospheric response, namely the poleward shift of the tropospheric jet stream. We attribute part of these differences to the missing representation of feedbacks between chemistry and dynamics in the specified chemistry ensemble, which affect the dynamical heating rates, and part of it to the lack of spatial asymmetries in the prescribed ozone fields. This effect is investigated using a sensitivity ensemble that was forced by a three-dimensional instead of a two-dimensional ozone field.