H160-09
Rapid methanogenesis as a significant control on carbon capture and storage

Tuesday, 15 December 2020: 04:42
Virtual
Rebecca L L Tyne1, Peter H Barry2, Michael Lawson3, David J Byrne4, Oliver Warr5, Hao Xie6, Michael J Formolo7, John M Eiler8 and Chris J Ballentine1, (1)University of Oxford, Earth Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom, (2)Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, United States, (3)ExxonMobil Houston, Houston, TX, United States, (4)CRPG Centre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, CNRS, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France, (5)University of Toronto, Department of Earth Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada, (6)JPL/NASA/Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States, (7)Exxon Mobil Upstream Research, Houston, TX, United States, (8)Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States
Abstract:
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a key strategy in mitigating the environmental impact of CO2 emissions. However, the potential trapping/storage mechanisms required for CCS to effectively sequester CO2 on geologic timescales remains unclear. Independently, several hydrocarbon reservoirs have undergone CO2 injection as a means of enhanced oil recovery (EOR), providing an opportunity to evaluate the (bio)geochemical behaviour of injected carbon.

Here we present noble gas, stable isotope, and clumped isotope data from two comparable oil fields with contrasting production histories. The Olla field (Louisiana, USA, n=7) was CO2-flooded during the 1980s. Data from this site are compared to the nearby Nebo-Hemphill field (n = 7), which has never been subjected to EOR injection. This integrated approach allows us to place constraints on both physical and biogeochemical processes resulting from CO2 injection. From noble gas data we estimate that there is a minimum CO2 loss of ~90% within the Olla field, and that solubility trapping is the dominant CO2 sink. However, bulk and clumped isotope constraints on the presence of microbial methane show that, even with the most conservative estimates, CO2 consumption via methanogenesis is significant within the Olla field. Although this is quantitatively less than the amount of CO2 that has been dissolved into water, it nonetheless represents a substantial CO2 loss mechanism, at rates of which are significant on engineering timescales. This presents a significant consideration for CCS, as CH4 is less soluble and more mobile than CO2, thus there is an enhanced potential of gas loss associated with CH4 production from sites where CO2 injection could drive significant methanogenesis. Similar geochemical trends in other injected and natural CO2 fields suggest that microbial methanogenesis may be a globally significant process and therefore a paramount factor in site selection for future CCS projects.