PP011-10
The Effect of Burning on the Dissolution Behaviour and Silicon and Oxygen Isotope Composition of Phytolith Silica
The Effect of Burning on the Dissolution Behaviour and Silicon and Oxygen Isotope Composition of Phytolith Silica
Tuesday, 8 December 2020: 06:06
Virtual
Abstract:
The δ30Si and δ18O values of silica phytoliths precipitated in plants can be applied to paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Here, the effects of burning and partial dissolution of phytoliths on their isotopic compositions and dissolution behaviour were examined. Phytoliths were heated to 700˚C and then dissolution experiments were conducted in batch reactors under a range of pH (4-8) and temperature (4-19˚C) conditions. Heating caused a -2.6 ‰ shift in phytolith δ18O values. During dissolution, the δ18O of heated phytoliths increased by up to 3.6 ‰ until ~30-40% saturation was reached, and then precipitation of new silica reduced δ18O despite a net dissolution. The peak δ18O values reached during partial dissolution were 4.3 ‰ lower than observed for unheated phytoliths. Heating did not cause a significant change in δ30Si values, and partial dissolution of heated phytoliths only caused a significant change in δ30Si values in one of the six experiments (pH 8, T 4˚C). Heating reduces the number of surface silanols, resulting in the incorporation of oxygen from 18O-depleted hydroxyl groups and the formation of strained siloxane bonds. Dissolution of burned phytoliths progressed more slowly than dissolution of fresh phytoliths in conditions that are less favourable for dissolution (i.e. low pH and T) and more quickly in conditions that are favourable (i.e. high pH and T). We propose that fewer hydrolysis sites exist on the surface of heated phytoliths because the isolated silanols that remain after heating are difficult to deprotonate at low pH. However, at higher pH the breakage of strained siloxane bonds in burned phytoliths may result a higher dissolution rate relative to fresh phytoliths. We recommend caution in using the δ18O values of soil phytoliths in paleoclimate reconstructions as they can be altered during both heating and partial dissolution. Additionally, for phytolith assemblages collected from archaeological hearths or grasslands prone to wildfires, the shift towards lower δ18O values caused by heating would result in overestimations of temperature and would complicate interpretations of relative changes in δ18O of phytoliths over time. Care must be taken to identify alteration by dissolution or burning, which may not always be visually evident.