GC038-0001
Glacial-interglacial methane cycle, what we know and don’t know

Wednesday, 9 December 2020
Poster
Michael Dyonisius1,2, Vasilii V Petrenko3, James Lee4, Jochen Schmitt5, Jonas Beck6, Jon Shelley Edwards7, Benjamin Young7, Janani Ventakesh8, James Menking7, Rachael Rhodes9, Thomas Blunier10, Edward Brook7 and Hubertus Fischer11, (1)University of Rochester, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rochester, United States, (2)Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Physics of Ice Climate and Earth, Copenhagen, Denmark, (3)University of Rochester, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rochester, NY, United States, (4)Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, United States, (5)University of Bern, Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, Bern, Switzerland, (6)University of Bern, Physics Institute, Bern, Switzerland, (7)Oregon State University, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Corvallis, OR, United States, (8)Niels Bohr Institute, Physics of Ice Climate and Earth, København Ø, Denmark, (9)University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, (10)Niels Bohr Institute - University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, (11)University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Abstract:
Since the preindustrial era, atmospheric methane (CH4) concentration has increased by ~2.5 fold and accounted for ~17% of the total change in Earth's radiative forcing. Measurements of paleoatmospheric CH4 from ice cores can provide historical perspectives on the natural component of the CH4 budget (which currently accounts for ~40% of total CH4 emissions). High-resolution CH4 concentration measurements from ice cores show large millennial- to centennial-scale abrupt CH4­ variability concurrent with rapid temperature changes in Greenland. The rate of CH4­ increase over the last decade is comparable to some of the fastest rate of CH4­ increase observed in the ice core record. Low to mid-latitude wetlands are thought to be the dominant drivers of CH4 variability during these rapid climate events. Recent analyses of radiomethane (Δ14CH4) over Termination 1 strengthen this hypothesis by showing that contributions from old carbon reservoirs such as permafrost and marine hydrates were small. Stable isotopes of CH413CH4 and δD-CH­4) can be used to further identify the sources of the abrupt CH4 transitions. δ13CH4 can be used to distinguish between microbial (wetlands, ruminants, etc.) and biomass burning sources. δD-CH­4 can be used to fingerprint the latitude in which the CH4 is produced, thus distinguishing emissions from low-latitude tropical wetlands vs. boreal wetlands. However, Antarctic CH4 stable isotopes were decoupled from CH4 concentration variability. To the first order, this suggests that during the abrupt CH4 rise there was no significant change in the relative fraction of one CH4 source vs. the other (i.e., the same relative mixture of sources increasing equally). The CH4 stable isotopes instead correlate better with the shape of other paleo records such as atmospheric CO2. Unfortunately, we still do not have a good understanding of the causal relationship behind the correlation. Recent studies showed that extraneous CH4 is produced during the melting of dust-rich Greenland ice associated with cold climatic periods. It is challenging to interpret the global CH4 cycle with measurements from Antarctic ice cores only. Reliable, artifact-free measurements of CH4 isotopes from cold-period Greenland ice are needed to complement the existing Antarctic record and provide further insights.