GP016-05
Testing component analysis of remanent magnetization curves with a series of synthetic mixtures: insights into the reliability of unmixing natural samples

Wednesday, 16 December 2020: 18:00
Virtual
Kuang He1,2, Xiangyu Zhao3, Yongxin Pan1,2, Xiang Zhao4, Huafeng Qin5 and Tongwei Zhang1,2, (1)Paleomagnetism and Geochronology Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Earth and Planetary Physics, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, (2)France-China Joint Laboratory for Evolution and Development of Magnetotactic MultiCellular Organisms (LIA-MagMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, (3)National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo, Japan, (4)Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, (5)State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Abstract:
Isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) unmixing is an important quantitative method to reconstruct underlying magnetic components. There are two commonly applied unmixing approaches, i.e., model-distribution-based and endmember-based approaches. While both approaches are known to be subject to uncertainty, it remains difficult to evaluate the reliability of these methods due to the lack of an independent method to validate estimated results. For this purpose, we performed unmixing on a series of synthetic mixture samples of andesite powder and cultivated magnetotactic bacteria (Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense strain MSR-1). Hysteresis loops, IRM acquisition curves, backfield curves, and first-order reversal curves (FORCs) were obtained. In our experiments, endmember-based unmixing can quantify the underlying endmembers better than the method using lognormal distributions. Moreover, the results by the endmember approach are consistent with that obtained from FORC analysis based on principal component analysis (FORC-PCA). However, when the datasets of samples or the variability of their magnetic properties are limited, the endmember model may fail to identify pure endmembers while the model-distribution-based unmixing may work. We demonstrated that by combining the two approaches it could provide improved unmixing results.