PP045-02
Expanding the palette of potential explanations for change and variability in paleoclimatic reconstructions by applying data-science and machine-learning methods to diagnose climate change and climate variability in transient and long-run snapshot simulations
Abstract:
The use of only long-term means or simple measures of variability may in part be technologically motivated, because any simulation has the potential to produce as much surface-climate data as has ever been observed, plus many unobservable variables. Recent developments accompanying the data-science and machine-learning democratization of data analysis have the potential of greatly diversifying the characterization of paleoclimatic simulations by allowing the standard tools of synoptic and dynamic climatology (e.g. PCA/eigenanalysis, composite anomalies and correlation fields) to be applied to long paleoclimatic simulations. Such applications require reframing our view of the simulations as having two components: climate change, as represented by long-term mean differences, and (temporally) local anomalies, or differences from the varying long-term means.
An example implemented in R to perform large-scale eigenanalysis and “rolling” applications of composite anomaly analyses illustrates, for example, that the relative importance of large-scale controls of interannual variations in drought in the midcontinent of North America vary over the Holocene, with evaporative demand decreasing, large-scale subsidence increasing, and moisture flux into the interior showing little variation.