A177-0001
A comparison of the parametric and non-parametric deep learning algorithm in estimating PM2.5 over Delhi-NCR region in north-west India

Tuesday, 15 December 2020
Poster
Bijoy Krishna Gayen, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, India, Dipanwita Dutta Mrs., Vidyasagar University, Remote sensing and GIS, Medinipur, India, Prasenjit Acharya Mr., Vidyasagar University, Department of Geography, Medinipur, India and Muhammad Bilal Mr., Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, School of Marine Sciences, Nanjing, China
Abstract:
The national capital region (Delhi - NCR) of India is one of the highest polluted regions of the world with an annual average PM2.5 concentration of 125 µgm-3. With increasing population and industrialization, the problem of air pollution has compounded in recent years. In this study, the efficiency of the soft computing algorithm was examined using satellite derive aerosol optical depth (AOD) in conjunction with meteorological parameters and land use information to estimate the monthly mean PM2.5 concentrations across the region from June 2017 to May 2018. The daily ground-level PM2.5 data set was obtained from 21 different monitoring stations across Delhi-NCR from June 2017 to May 2018. A data-driven adaptive neuro-fuzzy soft computing algorithm was used along with the sub-clustering algorithm (ANFIS-SC) to estimate PM2.5. For comparison purposes, PM2.5 concentrations were also estimated using the artificial neural network (ANN) and classical multiple linear regression (MLR) method. Results showed a moderate to a high degree of agreement between observed and predicted PM2.5 concentration for both testing and validation period (R2 ~ 0.98 for ANFIS-SC, 0.85 for ANN and 0.64 for MLR). Comparative analysis showed that ANFIS-SC with the highest predictive ability and low fraction bias (-0.00004) compared to the ANN and MLR. The spatial modelling of the PM2.5 concentration near the ground also revealed notable space-time variations. While comparing, the agreement of the estimated values with the in-situ observations shows a R2 of 0.86 at an annual scale. Nevertheless, the model shows a R2 of 0.74, 0.84, 0.70 and 0.76 for monsoon, post-monsoon, winter and summer, respectively.