GC051-0005
Marine wild-capture fisheries after nuclear war

Thursday, 10 December 2020
Poster
Kim Scherrer, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Barcelona, Spain, Cheryl S Harrison, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, School of Earth, Environmental and Marine Science, Edinburg, TX, United States, Ryan Heneghan, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, Eric D Galbraith, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, Charles Bardeen, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States, Joshua Livingston Coupe, Rutgers University, Environmental Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ, United States, Jonas Jägermeyr, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany, Nicole S Lovenduski, University of Colorado, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States, August Luna, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, United States, Alan Robock, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States, Jessica Stevens, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Port Isabel, TX, United States, Samantha Stevenson, University of California Santa Barbara, Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, Santa Barbara, CA, United States, Owen B Toon, Univ Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States and Lili Xia, Rutgers Univ, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
Abstract:
Nuclear war, beyond its devastating direct impacts, is expected to cause global climatic perturbations through injections of soot into the upper atmosphere. Reduced temperature and sunlight could drive unprecedented reductions in agricultural production, endangering global food security. However, the effects of nuclear war on marine wild-capture fisheries, which significantly contribute to the global animal protein and micronutrient supply, remain unexplored. We simulate the climatic effects of six war scenarios on fish biomass and catch globally, using a state-of-the-art Earth system model and global process-based fisheries model. We also simulate how either rapidly increased demand for fish (driven by food shortages) or decreased ability to fish (due to fuel scarcity, security concerns or damaged infrastructure), would affect global catches. We find a temporary negative climatic impact that intensifies with soot emissions, with global biomass and catch falling by up to 18±3% and 29±7% post-war under business-as-usual fishing. This decrease is similar in magnitude to 2090’s declines under unmitigated global warming. Increasing demand results in annual to biennial catch increases, followed by precipitous decline with losses of up to 70%. In contrast, decreased ability to fish allows recovery of depleted fish stocks, creating decadal catch increases after initial decreases. Our results indicate that intensified fishing can only temporarily compensate for a very small fraction of agricultural food shortages. Management measures that rebuild the biomass of overfished populations can multiply the maximum possible fish catch, increasing mitigation of food shortages during global cooling events. This buffering function in the event of a global food emergency adds to the many benefits of effective and precautionary fisheries management.