GC130-05
Greenhouse gas fluxes from green roof substrates and biochar as a mitigation tool

Wednesday, 16 December 2020: 19:16
Virtual
Md Abdul Halim1, Juliana Vantellingen1, Adam Gorgolewski1, William Rose1, Melanie Sifton1, Jennifer Drake2, Liat Margolis3 and Sean C Thomas1, (1)University of Toronto, Graduate Department of Forestry, Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and Design, Toronto, ON, Canada, (2)University of Toronto, Department of Civil & Mineral Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada, (3)University of Toronto, Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and Design, Toronto, ON, Canada
Abstract:
Green roofs (GRs) are an emerging approach to enhance climate resilience of urban areas, including mitigation of stormwater discharge and urban heat island effects. There has also been recent interest in GRs to enhance C sequestration, but direct measurements of greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes from established GR systems are lacking. To better understand the relationships between GR vegetation and substrate with GHG fluxes, we measured CO2 and CH4 fluxes, using a dynamic closed chamber technique, from substrates of experimental GR units in Toronto in the early, mid, and late growing seasons of 2018. This measurement included extensive systems with mixes of Sedum species and intensive systems using a native species mix, with both vegetation types implemented in a factorial design with substrate depth and type (high vs. low organic matter [OM] content) as factors. We hypothesized that CO2 effluxes would be higher in high OM substrates, and that systems with low vegetation cover and high OM would act as CH4 sources. Substrate CO2 efflux varied from 0.1 – 0.51 µmol m-2s-1, with pronounced differences in flux rates related to substrate type and depth (higher with increased substrate depth) but had little effect of vegetation type. Substrate CH4 fluxes included both net efflux and uptake (-0.1 to 0.14 nmol m-2s-1). Net uptake was found to be associated with high vegetation cover, particularly of native species. Results suggest that high OM in GR substrates, while enhancing plant growth, can result in appreciable C losses, partly as CH4.

Studies have explored various GR substrates to enhance C sequestration of GRs. Biochar, usually derived from pyrolyzed waste biomass, can be a potential amendment to GR substrates to mitigate C loss. Recalcitrant biochars can increase soil water holding capacity and plant growth, and also can suppress soil GHG fluxes in managed systems. However, the biochar effects on GHG fluxes of GR substrates have not previously been evaluated. In a similar experimental setup as above, we examined the effects of biochar addition (20 t.ha-1, sugar maple biochar) to a high-OM GR substrate. Initial results indicate that biochar addition can significantly reduce C loss from GR, mainly by suppressing CH4 effluxes. Overall, our studies suggest that biochar can be a sustainable amendment to GR substrates to mitigate C loss.