GC053-0005
Using an integrated assessment model to assess the global implications of differing bioenergy carbon capture and sequestration policy schemes
Abstract:
This paper finds that the presence of BECCS results in lower carbon prices throughout the model run, but the effect that fossil fuel CCS has on carbon prices was negligible when BECCS was available. BECCS is oft-critiqued for exerting pressure on land and water for the purpose of growing biomass versus food, but this research modeled that the deployment of BECCS has little influence on the share of projected biomass energy consumption. The stringency of climate targets and the socioeconomic context, not differences in policy schemes, mainly determined what share of global energy consumption came from biomass in the model. As BECCS is the only negative emissions technology (NET) in GCAM, besides afforestation, these results could be interpreted as illuminating the contributions of clean energy, fossil CCS, and NETs in general, rather than specifically about BECCS. More research is needed to analyze the impact other NETs would have on the international economy if deployed at scale, but this paper begins to understand the influence that a widely adopted NET would have on the planet.