NS010
Geophysical Methods for Groundwater Evaluation and Management I

Tuesday, 15 December 2020: 17:30-18:30
Virtual
Primary Convener:  Rosemary J Knight, Stanford University, Geophysics, Stanford, CA, United States; Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA, United States
Conveners:  John W Lane Jr, USGS, Hydrogeophysics Branch, Storrs, CT, United States and Rosemary J Knight, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA, United States
Primary Liaison:  Rosemary J Knight, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA, United States; Stanford University, Geophysics, Stanford, CA, United States
Chairs:  Rosemary J Knight, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA, United States and John W Lane Jr, USGS, Hydrogeophysics Branch, Storrs, CT, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Rosemary J Knight, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA, United States
17:30
It’s a very small Island with more than 140 distributed bores, so why would geophysics make a difference to our conceptualization of the groundwater resource? (766559)
Timothy J Munday, CSIRO, Mineral Resources, Kensington, WA, Australia, Andrew R Taylor, CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia, Camilla Soerensen, CSIRO, Mineral Resources, Perth, Australia, Kevin Cahill, CSIRO Australian Resources Research Center, Perth, Australia and Joanna Ellis, Power and Water, Darwin, Australia
17:34
Preliminary Results from a Towed Streamer Controlled Source Electromagnetic Survey for Groundwater over the New England Continental Shelf (682705)
Alan D Chave1, Rob L Evans1, Jian Zhu2, John Bailey1 and Steve Lerner1, (1)Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, United States, (2)Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, United States
17:38
Did the Southwest US aquifer-systems recover from the 2012-2015 drought? Insight from InSAR, GRACE and groundwater level data (694014)
Chandrakanta Ojha, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia; Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States, Susanna Werth, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA, United States and Manoochehr Shirzaei, Virginia Tech, Department of Geosciences, Blacksburg, VA, United States
17:42
Subsidence-Derived Aquifer Volume Strain Models for the San Joaquin Valley, California and Central Arizona (745620)
Grace Carlson, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States, Manoochehr Shirzaei, Virginia Tech, Department of Geosciences, Blacksburg, VA, United States, Chandrakanta Ojha, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia, Megan Marie Miller, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States and Susanna Werth, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA, United States
17:46
Understanding the Link Between Changing Head Levels and Land Subsidence: A Field Experiment in California’s San Joaquin Valley (674984)
Matthew Lees, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States, Rosemary J Knight, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA, United States and Ryan Smith, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Geosciences and Geological and Petroleum Engineering, Rolla, MO, United States
17:54
Improving the Hydrogeologic Conceptualization of a Remote and Arid Palaeovalley Groundwater System Using Airborne Electromagnetics and Seismic Refraction and Reflection (740481)
Brady Flinchum, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States, Luk JM Peeters, CSIRO, Land and Water, Adelaide, SA, Australia, Timothy J Munday, CSIRO, Mineral Resources, Kensington, WA, Australia and Kevin Cahill, CSIRO Australian Resources Research Center, Perth, Australia
17:58
Characterizing hydrostratigraphic communication between the various unconsolidated sediment aquifers of the East Flathead region in northwestern Montana through hydrogeophysical surveys (761180)
Trevor Paul Irons1, Elizabeth Breitmeyer1 and James L Berglund2, (1)Montana Tech of The University of Montana, Geophysics, Butte, MT, United States, (2)Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Butte, MT, United States
18:02
Moderated Q&A Time