S025
The Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) – Advancing Regional and Global Earthquake Monitoring and Response
Session ID#: 158926
Session Description:
The Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) is a collaboration between universities, state agencies, and the US Geological Survey responsible for providing real-time earthquake information and data in the United States and territories. Through routine earthquake monitoring, the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system, and dense regional seismic and geodetic networks, ANSS provides real-time earthquake information and impact products for improved situational awareness and emergency response, continuous seismic waveform and strong ground motion measurements, earthquake catalogs for seismic hazard mapping and other research activities, and community outreach for improved hazards awareness. We broadly welcome abstracts that highlight developments and advances in earthquake response, regional earthquake monitoring and impacts reporting (such as machine learning and new and non-traditional sensing capabilities); uses of ANSS data and earthquake products in disaster response, basic research, and community outreach; public engagement on earthquake hazards and impacts; and any other topics that leverage the products and data of ANSS.
Index Terms:
1209 Tectonic deformation [GEODESY AND GRAVITY]
7215 Earthquake source observations [SEISMOLOGY]
7219 Seismic monitoring and test-ban treaty verification [SEISMOLOGY]
7294 Seismic instruments and networks [SEISMOLOGY]
Primary Convener: William D Barnhart, USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, CO, United States
Conveners: Elizabeth A Vanacore, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, United States and J Renate Hartog, Pacific Northwest Seismic Network, Seattle, United States
NSF SAGE Facility Finalizing New Rapid-Response Equipment Pool (1057195)
Justin R Sweet, IRIS, Socorro, United States, Kent Randall Anderson, IRIS, Sandia Park, NM, United States, Anne Meltzer, Lehigh University, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bethlehem, PA, United States and Robert Woodward, IRIS, Washington, DC, United States
Characterization of the Southwestern Puerto Rico Seismic Sequence Full Wavefield Decay (1059389)
Coralis Del Mar Friedman, University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, Geology, Mayaguez, United States, Elizabeth A Vanacore, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, United States and Thomas Lecocq, Royal Observatory of Belgium, Seismology-Gravimetry, Brussels, Belgium
Considerations for Modernizing Earthquake Data Analysis at the Southern California Seismic Network (1069885)
Gabrielle Tepp1, Ellen Yu2, Rayomand Bhadha3, Allen L Husker4, Clara E Yoon5, Ryan Tam2, Zachary E. Ross1, Aparna Bhaskaran2, Shang-lin Chen2, Dominic Scheckel1, Zackary Newman1 and Marshal David McGurk1, (1)California Institute of Technology, Seismological Laboratory, Pasadena, United States, (2)Caltech Seismo Lab, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)California Institute of Technology, Seismological Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (5)U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Pasadena, United States
Simulation of Strong Ground Motion Data from the 18 March 2020 Mw 5.7 Magna, Utah, Earthquake to Evaluate the Wasatch Front Community Velocity Model (WFCVM) (1093572)
Sean Hutchings1, Keith D. Koper1 and Arben Pitarka2, (1)University of Utah, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Salt Lake City, United States, (2)Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United States
Developing Earthquake Hazard Resilience in Alaska Through Public Engagement (1094702)
Shila Cotton1, Lea Gardine1, Beth Grassi2 and Gabriel Low3, (1)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (2)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, United States, (3)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, United States
An Overview of ANSS (1108887)
William D Barnhart, USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, CO, United States and Cecily Wolfe, USGS, Reston, United States
Station Timeliness of the Canadian National Seismograph Network and its Implications for Earthquake Early Warning in Canada (1116335)
Stephen Crane1, Henry Seywerd1, Lisa Nykolaishen2 and John Adams1, (1)Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, (2)Government of Canada, Sidney, BC, Canada
Reducing the Costs Associated With Dense Seismic Network Management (1118469)
Odette Hinds1, Sylvain Pigeon2, David Easton1 and Michael Perlin3, (1)Nanometrics Inc, Kanata, ON, Canada, (2)Nanometrics Inc., Ottawa, Canada, (3)Nanometrics Inc, Ottawa, Canada
Characterization of the 2020 Mw 5.7 Magna, Utah Seismic Sequence Full Wavefield Decay (1122904)
Kimberly Trahan, University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, Geology, Mayaguez, United States, Elizabeth A Vanacore, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, United States and Thomas Lecocq, Royal Observatory of Belgium, Seismology-Gravimetry, Brussels, Belgium
The Regional Networks of ANSS (1126450)
J Renate Hartog, Pacific Northwest Seismic Network, Seattle, United States and Kristine L Pankow, University of Utah, Seismograph Stations, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Developing Guidance to Communicate Global Aftershock Forecasts (1127122)
Max Schneider1, Sara K McBride1, Nicholas van der Elst2, Jeanne Hardebeck1, Andrew Jay Michael3 and Morgan Page2, (1)USGS, Moffett Field, United States, (2)USGS, Pasadena, United States, (3)USGS, Moffett Field, CA, United States
Positioning AQMS Software in GitLab for Growth (1130263)
Aparna Bhaskaran1, Rayomand Bhadha2, Michael Black3, Jimmy Choi4, Paul A Friberg5, Mike Hagerty6, J Renate Hartog7, Ellen Yu3 and Junli Zhang8, (1)CalTech Seismological Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)Caltech Seismo Lab, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)USGS Pasadena Field Office, Pasadena, United States, (5)Instrumental Software Technologies, Inc. (ISTI), New Paltz, NY, United States, (6)Instrumental Software Technologies, Inc., Saratoga Springs, NY, United States, (7)Pacific Northwest Seismic Network, Seattle, United States, (8)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States
Full Wavefield Aftershock Decay from RMS Ground Motion Displacements: An Omori-Utsu Law Proxy (1151581)
Elizabeth A Vanacore1, Coralis Del Mar Friedman2, Kimberly Trahan2 and Thomas Lecocq3, (1)University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, Dept Of Geology, Puerto Rico Seismic Network, Mayaguez, PR, United States, (2)University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, Geology, Mayaguez, United States, (3)Royal Observatory of Belgium, Seismology-Gravimetry, Brussels, Belgium
Implementation of HASH Focal Mechanism Determination Code for AQMS (1174340)
Mike Hagerty1, Paul A Friberg2 and Josh Stachnik1, (1)Instrumental Software Technologies, Inc., Saratoga Springs, NY, United States, (2)Instrumental Software Technologies, Inc. (ISTI), New Paltz, NY, United States
Modernization of the Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN), Advancing Regional Earthquake Monitoring Using Telemetry Diversity and High-Fidelity Seismic Stations (1202507)
Marcos Alvarez1, Valerie Thomas2, Glenn P Biasi3, Allen L Husker4, Igor Stubailo5 and Rayomand Bhadha5, (1)USGS Pasadena Field Office, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)USGS, Pasadena, United States, (3)U.S. Geological Survey, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)California Institute of Technology, Seismological Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (5)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
