S021
Seismology Contributions: Earthquake Ground Motions and Engineering Seismology

Session ID#: 162691

Session Description:
Contributions on ground motion prediction, amplification, seismic hazards, engineering seismology, or near-surface interactions that do not naturally fall under the scope of any of the special sessions.
Index Terms:

7299 General or miscellaneous [SEISMOLOGY]


Primary Convener:  Qinya Liu, University of Toronto, Department of Physics, Toronto, ON, Canada
Convener:  Wenyuan Fan, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, United States
 
Re-evaluating Ground Motion Intensity Conversion Equations for California and Implications for Hazard Map Assessment (1047963)
Molly Margaret Gallahue, Northwestern University, Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Evanston, IL, United States and Norman Abrahamson, University of California Berkeley, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Berkeley, CA, United States
 
3D High-Frequency Ground Motion Simulations of the Mw6.0, 24 August 2016 Amatrice, Italy Earthquake; validations against observations and ground motion models (1057923)
Aybige Akinci1, Arben Pitarka2, Pietro Artale Harris3, Pasquale De Gori3 and Mauro Buttinelli1, (1)Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy, (2)Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United States, (3)National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology, Rome, Italy
 
Evaluation of nonlinear site response at the S-net seafloor sites in the Japan Trench area (1060813)
Yadab P Dhakal and Takashi Kunugi, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Tsukuba, Japan
 
Updating Proxy-based Site Amplification Map in Osaka, Japan with Soil Borehole Data: A Bayesian Updating Scheme based on Uncertainty Projected Mapping (1065064)
Anirban Chakraborty1, Hiroyuki Goto2 and Sumio Sawada2, (1)Hosei University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, (2)Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
 
Separation of source, attenuation and site parameters of 2 moderate earthquakes in France: an elastic radiative transfer approach (1065701)
Grégoire Heller1, Ludovic Margerin2, Olivier Sèbe3, Jessie Mayor4, Marie Calvet2 and Paola Traversa5, (1)IRAP, Toulouse, France, (2)Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, CNRS, Toulouse, France, (3)CEA Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique DAM, Arpajon Cedex, France, (4)EDF Lab. Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France, (5)EDF Electricité de France, CEIDRE-TEGG, Aix-en-Provence, France
 
Hybird Empirical Ground Motion Prediction Equations for the Gyeongju Area in South Korea (1070730)
Seonjeong Park, KINS Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of (South), Jung Mo Lee, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, Republic of (South) and Chang-Eob Baag, SNU, Seoul, South Korea; Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
 
Why does PSHA overpredict historically observed shaking data? (1075796)
Leah Salditch, U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, United States, Molly Margaret Gallahue, Northwestern University, Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Evanston, IL, United States, James Neely, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States, Seth Stein, Northwestern University, Earth & Planetary Sciences, Evanston, IL, United States, Susan Elizabeth Hough, U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Pasadena, United States and Norman Abrahamson, University of California Berkeley, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Berkeley, CA, United States
 
Searching for Empirical Nonlinear Site Response Applicable to Greater Vancouver, British Columbia (1079888)
Natalia Gomez Jaramillo, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, Sheri Molnar, University of Western Ontario, Earth Sciences, London, ON, Canada and Hadi Ghofrani, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
 
Impacts of clustering events on a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: A case study for Taiwan (1082716)
Chung-Han Chan, National Central University, Earthquake-Disaster & Risk Evaluation and Management (E-DREaM) Center, Zhongli, Taiwan, Hsin-Hua Huang, Academia Sinica, Institute of Earth Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan and Yu-Fang Hsu, Institute of Earth Sciences Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
 
Basin structure and ground vulnerability derived from HVSR analysis in Pohang, South Korea (1085714)
Su Young Kang, Pusan National University, Institute of Geohazard Research, Busan, South Korea, Kwang-Hee Kim, Pusan National University, Department of Geological Science, Busan, South Korea, Mikyung Choi, Korea Meteorological Administration, Seoul, South Korea, Sun-Cheon Park, NIMR/KMA, Seogwipo, Korea, Republic of (South), Yong Sik Gihm, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea and Byungmin Kim, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea
 
The Community Seismic Network: Applications and Expansion to 1200 Stations (1093722)
Monica D Kohler1, Robert W Clayton2, Yousef Bozorgnia3, Ertugrul Taciroglu3 and Richard Guy3, (1)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (2)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
 
Comparison of Observed and Simulated Ground Motions in the Los Angeles Basin (1097045)
Brianna C. Birkel1, John Emilio Vidale2 and Chukwuebuka Chukwuemeka Nweke1, (1)University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States, (2)University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
 
2023 U.S. 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model (1097487)
Mark David Petersen1, Alison Shumway2, Peter Powers3, Edward H Field4, Morgan P Moschetti5, Kishor Jaiswal6, Arthur D Frankel7, Kenneth S Rukstales8, Sanaz Rezaeian9, Oliver Salz Boyd10, Sean Ahdi11, Kyle Withers12, Brad Aagaard13, James Allen Smith14, Erin Wirth7, Andrea L Llenos15, Andrew Jay Michael16, Charles S Mueller4, Justin L Rubinstein13, Fred F Pollitz17, Yuehua Zeng11, Alexandra E Hatem18, Jessica Thompson Jobe3, Henry Mason14, Rob Chase11, Brandon Clayton19, Jason M Altekruse20 and Leah Salditch21, (1)Denver Federal Center, Lakewood, CO, United States, (2)USGS, Golden, United States, (3)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, CO, United States, (4)USGS, Denver, CO, United States, (5)US Geological Survey, Denver, CO, United States, (6)Research Civil Engineer, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, United States, (7)USGS, Seattle, WA, United States, (8)US Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO, United States, (9)USGS, Golden, CO, United States, (10)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Denver, CO, United States, (11)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, United States, (12)Sdsu/Ucsd, La Mesa, United States, (13)USGS, Menlo Park, CA, United States, (14)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center Denver, Denver, United States, (15)USGS California Water Science Center Menlo Park, Menlo Park, CA, United States, (16)USGS, Moffett Field, CA, United States, (17)U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Menlo Park, CA, United States, (18)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, CA, United States, (19)Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, United States, (20)Fugro Consultants, Inc. Lakewood, Lakewood, CO, United States, (21)Northwestern University, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Evanston, IL, United States
 
Seismic response of Nenana sedimentary basin, central Alaska (1097593)
Kyle Smith, Academia Sinica, Institute of Earth Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, Carl Tape, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States and Victor C Tsai, Brown University, Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Providence, RI, United States
 
The Effects of Basin Topography and Low-velocity Layer in Near Field Ground Motion Amplification (1101849)
Zeyu Lu and Feng Hu, University of Science and Technology of China, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Hefei, China
 
A 3D Computational Model for Ground Motion Simulations in India (1101854)
Sreejaya KP, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India and S.T.G Raghukanth, Indian Institute of Technology-Madras, Chennai, India
 
Estimation of Ground Characteristics Using Ambient Noise and MASW (1102321)
DoYoon Lim1, Jae-Kwang Ahn2, Eui-Hong Hwang2 and Sun-Cheon Park3, (1)KMA Korea Meteorlogical Administration, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), (2)KMA Korea Meteorlogical Administration, Seoul, South Korea, (3)KMA Korea Meteorological Administration, Seoul, South Korea
 
Site Response Analysis and Shallow Shear Wave Velocity (Vs) Distribution beneath Kashmir Basin from microtremor experiments (1102707)
S Vishal Gupta, CSIR Fourth Paradigm Institute, Bangalore, India, Imtiyaz Ahmed Parvez, CSIR Fourth Paradigm Institute, Solid Earth Modelling Programme, Bangalore, India and Prosanta Kumar Khan, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Applied Geophysics, Dhanbad, India
 
Shallow-crustal earthquake scenarios for the Santiago City, Chile, evaluated with physics-based numerical modeling and ground motion models (1105717)
Cesar Pasten1, Fabián Ortiz Sr.2, Jose Bustos Sr.2, Sergio Ruiz3, Rodrigo Astroza4 and Gabriel Easton5, (1)University of Chile, Department of Civil Engineering and AMTC, Santiago, Chile, (2)University of Chile, Department of Civil Engineering, Santiago, Chile, (3)Universidad de Chile, Departamento de Geofísica, Santiago, Chile, (4)Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Santiago, Chile, (5)University of Chile, Department of Geology, Santiago, Chile
 
Seismic Hazard Assessment for Sohar Region, Northern Oman (1107515)
Issa W El Hussain1, Ahmed Deif1, Adel Mohamed2 and Yousuf Al-Shijbi3, (1)Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman, (2)National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Helwan, Egypt, (3)Sultan Qaboos University, Earthquake Monitoring Center, Al-Khoudh, Oman
 
Incorporating Near-Surface Structure into the 3-D Cascadia Seismic Velocity Model For Earthquake Hazard Estimates in the Pacific Northwest (1116093)
Erin A Wirth, U.S. Geological Survey, Seattle, CT, United States, Alex Grant, USGS, ESC, Moffett Field, United States, Ian Stone, USGS, Seattle, United States, Arthur D Frankel, USGS, Seattle, WA, United States and William J Stephenson, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, United States
 
Dense horizontal to vertical spectral ratio and microtremor array measurements at Kanto Plain, Japan (1118735)
Toru Suzuki, Mony Exploration Corporation, Itabashi, Japan and Koichi Hayashi, Geometrics Inc., San Jose, CA, United States
 
Reduced-order Modeling for Physics-based Ground Motion Simulation (1121111)
John Rekoske, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, United States, Alice-Agnes Gabriel, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Munich, Germany and Dave May, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, United States
 
Large-Scale Controls on Earthquake-Induced Building Damage and Magnitude Estimates for Historical Earthquakes (1126333)
Aisling O'Kane and Alex Copley, COMET, University of Cambridge, Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge, United Kingdom
 
A Case Study of the 29 May 2013 Isla Vista M4.8 Earthquake: Evaluating Site Response Using Geology- and mHVSR-Based Site Characterizations (1130353)
Andrea Di Martino, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, Alan Yong, US Geological Survey, Pasadena, CA, United States, Lilah Guerra, US Geological Survey, Moffett field, United States, Jose Gomez, US Geological Survey, Pasadena, United States, Tara Nye, University of Oregon, Earth Sciences, Eugene, OR, United States, Jamieson Steidl, USGS Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States, Antony Jeffrey Martin, Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States, Koichi Hayashi, Geometrics, San Jose, CA, United States, Alessandro Amorosi, University of Bologna, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Bologna, Italy and Ali Shafiee, Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona, United States
 
Seismic Source Characterization for Probabilistic and Scenario Seismic Hazard Analysis beneath the Complex Tectonic Setting (1134252)
Hiroe Miyake, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan and Nobuyuki Morikawa, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Tsukuba, Japan
 
Current status of design earthquake determination regulation for nuclear power plant sites in South Korea and its revision direction (1136840)
Hoseon Choi, KINS Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of (South) and Myunghyun Noh, KINS Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, Daejeon, South Korea
 
Development of hybrid site-specific ground motion model of response spectra using GMPE and machine learning (1138962)
Hisahiko Kubo, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Tsukuba, Japan and Asako Iwaki, NIED, Tsukuba, Japan
 
Ground Amplification Factors Considering Topographic Effect and Incidence Angle (1143986)
Seongnoh Ahn, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea, Republic of (South) and Byungmin Kim, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea
 
Topographic Ground Motion Amplifications in Pohang, South Korea (1147467)
Junyoung Lee, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Korea, Republic of (South), Kwang-Hee Kim, Pusan National University, Department of Geological Science, Busan, South Korea, Su Young Kang, Pusan National University, Institute of Geohazard Research, Busan, South Korea and Byungmin Kim, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea
 
Investigation of complex seismic wave propagation in sedimentary basins via 3-D waveform modeling (1163401)
Yuan Tian, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States, Carl Tape, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States and Bryant Chow, University of Alaska - Fairbanks, Fairbanks, United States
 
Development of a Seismic Directivity Adjustment Model to the Median and Aleatory Variability of Ground Motion Models (1165967)
Brian Kelly, University of Florida, Department of Geological Sciences, Ft Walton Beach, FL, United States, Kyle Withers, USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, United States and Morgan P Moschetti, US Geological Survey, Denver, CO, United States
 
Evaluating the Impact of Alternative Seismic Velocity Models on Simulated Ground Motions from Large Magnitude California Earthquakes (1169988)
Philip J Maechling1, Fabio Silva1, Robert W Graves2 and Yehuda Ben-Zion3, (1)Southern California Earthquake Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (2)US Geological Survey, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)University of Southern California, Department of Earth Sciences and Southern California Earthquake Center, Los Angeles, United States
 
The Effect of 3D Geological, Geotechnical, and Geophysical Models on Seismic Hazard for the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains (1177876)
Chris H Cramer, University of Memphis, CERI, Memphis, TN, United States, Ashly Cabas, North Carolina State University, Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Raleigh, NC, United States, Cassie Gann-Phillips, North Carolina State University, Civil, Construction, and Envirionmental Engineering, Raleigh, NC, United States, Zachary Militello, North Carolina State University, Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Raleigh, NC, United States and James Kaklamanos, Merrimack College, North Andover, MA, United States
 
GIS-based historical earthquakes ground motion simulations: A study case in Central Italy, Fabriano (1741, Mw=6.17) and Camerino (1799, Mw=6.18) seismic events. (1178824)
Veronica Gironelli1,2, Tiziano Volatili1, Lucia Luzi3, Giulio Brunelli3, Miller Zambrano1 and Tondi Emanuele1,2, (1)University of Camerino, School of Science and Technology, Geology Division, Camerino, Italy, (2)Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Sezione di Sismologia e Tettonofisica, Camerino, Italy, (3)INGV National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology, Milan, Italy
 
Region-specific Ground Motion Models for Subduction seismicity in New Zealand (1179678)
Elena Florinela Manea Jr1, Sanjay Singh Bora1, Anna E Kaiser2, Jesse Hutchinson3, Matt Gerstenberger2 and Jesse Hutchinson, (1)GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, (2)GNS Science-Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Ltd, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, (3)University of Victoria, Ocean Networks Canada, Victoria, Canada
 
SPAC/CCA coefficients as tools for direct VS30 estimation (1198510)
Takumi Hayashida, Building Research Institute, IISEE, Ibaraki, Japan, Toshiaki Yokoi, Building Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan, Nityam Nepal, Department of Geology and Mines, Seismology and Geophysics Division, Thimphu, Bhutan and Mónica Olivar, Engineering Geological and Geophysical Consulting, San Salvador, El Salvador
See more of: Seismology