North Atlantic Simulations in Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II): Inter-Annual to Decadal Variability

Gokhan Danabasoglu1, Stephen G Yeager2, Who M Kim1, Erik Behrens3, Mats Bentsen4, Dave Bi5, Arne Biastoch6, Reiner Bleck7, Claus W Boning8, Alexandra Bozec9, Vittorio Canuto10, Christophe Cassou11, Eric Chassignet12, Andrew Coward13, Sergey Danilov14, Nikolay Diansky15, Helge Drange16, Riccardo Farneti17, Elodie Fernandez18, Pier Giuseppe Fogli19, Thomas Jung20, Gael Forget21, Yosuke Fujii22, Stephen Matthew Griffies23, Anatoly A. Gusev24, Patrick Heimbach25, Armando McNeil Howard26, Mehmet Ilicak27, Alicia R Karspeck2, Maxwell Kelley28, William Large29, Anthony Leboissetier28, Jianhua Lu30, Gurvan Madec31, Simon James Marsland32, Simona Masina33, Antonio Navarra34, A. J. George Nurser13, Anna Pirani35, Anastasia Romanou10, David Salas y Mélia36, Bonita L Hunter Samuels23, Markus Scheinert6, Dmitry Sidorenko37, Shan Sun38, Anne M Treguier39, Hiroyuki Tsujino40, Petteri Uotila41, Sophie Valcke11, Aurore Voldoire42, Qiang Wang43 and Igor Yashayaev44, (1)NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, United States, (2)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)Earth Sciences New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, (4)Uni Climate, Uni Research Ltd., Bergen, Norway, (5)CSIRO, Aspendale, VIC, Australia, (6)GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany, (7)NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA, (8)GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, FB1 Ocean Circulation and Climate Dynamics, Kiel, Germany, (9)Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States, (10)NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, United States, (11)CERFACS European Centre for Research and Advanced Training in Scientific Computation, Toulouse Cedex 01, France, (12)Florida State University, Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Tallahassee, United States, (13)National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom, (14)Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, (15)State oceanography institute, modeling of circulation at the ocean, Moscow, Russia, (16)Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway, (17)The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Trieste, Italy, (18)Mercator-Ocean, Toulouse, France, (19)CMCC - Bologna, Bologna, Italy, (20)Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Climate Dynamics, Bremerhaven, Germany, (21)Massachusetts Institute of Technology, EAPS, Cambridge, United States, (22)Meteorological Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan, (23)Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, United States, (24)Space Research Institute (IKI) and Institute for Problems in Mechanics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, (25)University of Texas at Austin, Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Austin, TX, United States, (26)Medgar Evers College, Brooklyn, NY, United States, (27)Uni Research, Bergen, Norway, (28)NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, United States, (29)NCAR, Boulder, CO, United States, (30)Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, China, (31)LOCEAN-IPSL, Paris, France, (32)CSIRO, Aspendale, Australia, (33)Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, Ocean Modeling and Data Assimilation Division, Bologna, Italy, (34)Istituto Nazional di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy, (35)International CLIVAR Project Office, ICTP, Trieste, Italy, (36)Centre National de Recherches M´et´eorologiques (CNRM-GAME), Toulouse, France, (37)Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz-Center for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, (38)NOAA Global Systems Laboratory, Boulder, United States, (39)Laboratoire de Physique des Oc´eans, UMR 6523, CNRS-Ifremer-IRD-UBO, IUEM, Plouzane, France, (40)Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan, (41)Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland, (42)CNRM, Toulouse, France, (43)Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Bremerhaven, Germany, (44)Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, NS, Canada
Abstract:
Simulated inter-annual to decadal variability and trends in the North Atlantic for the
1958-2007 period from twenty global ocean - sea-ice coupled models are presented.
These simulations are performed as contributions to the second phase of the Coordinated
Ocean-ice Reference Experiments (CORE-II). A major focus of the present study is the representation of Atlantic
meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) variability in the participating models.
Relationships between AMOC variability and those of some other related variables, such
as subpolar mixed layer depths, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), and the Labrador
Sea upper-ocean hydrographic properties, are also investigated. In general, AMOC
variability shows three distinct stages. During the first stage that lasts until the mid-
to late-1970s, AMOC is relatively steady, remaining lower than its long-term
(1958-2007) mean. Thereafter, AMOC intensifies with maximum transports achieved in the mid- to late-1990s. This enhancement is
then followed by a weakening trend until the end of our integration period. This
sequence of low frequency AMOC variability is consistent with previous studies.
Regarding strengthening of AMOC between about the mid-1970s and the mid-1990s, our results
support a previously identified variability mechanism where AMOC intensification is
connected to increased deep water formation in the subpolar North Atlantic, driven
by NAO-related surface fluxes. The simulations tend to show general agreement in their
representations of, for example, AMOC, sea surface temperature (SST), and subpolar mixed layer
depth variabilities. In particular, the observed variability of the North Atlantic SSTs is
captured well by all models. These findings indicate that simulated variability and
trends are primarily dictated by the atmospheric datasets which include the influence
of ocean dynamics from nature superimposed onto anthropogenic effects. Despite these
general agreements, there are many differences among the model solutions, particularly in the spatial structures of variability
patterns. For example, the location of the maximum AMOC variability differs among the
models between Northern and Southern Hemispheres.