This paper extends the literature on comparative school reform. It does so by tracing the debate’s contours into the interwar period and by looking at Habsburg successor states, as opposed to pre-1918 comparisons of Europe’s “major” countries. Countries like Yugoslavia and Romania had to merge several educational systems into a unified system. They could also choose whether to inherit or abolish school tracking. Reformers, while advancing very similar proposals, praised themselves for keeping communism at bay or bringing it closer to home, eschewing revolutions or uprooting reform-hindering leftovers of Habsburg bureaucracy, bringing their schools closer to the international standard or reflecting strong national particularisms.
At the heart of the paper is post-Habsburg states’ responses to Red Vienna’s (ultimately failed) attempt to create more “democratic” schools. The sources include contemporary newspapers and professional journals as well as archival sources from the League of Nations' Archives. The conflicting arguments for reform shown above represent new issues hardly noticeable before 1918: the fear of revolutions and communism, the internationalization of educational policy, and the perceived industrial future of Europe. These themes nuance historians’ understanding of what was hitherto subsumed under the banner of "modernization."
