In this paper, I argue that Black librarians’ subtle encouragement of autonomous Black thinking was a foundational step towards the revisionist work later associated with institutionalized Black archives. For example, by the early twentieth century, many leaders within the library profession often described the library as a “laboratory” or “workshop”—meaning the library was intended to be a space where people experimented with their ideas. Many officials, including Blue himself, touted the benefits of the newly popularized open shelving system. Open shelves encouraged patrons to explore their own interests and curiosities even when many librarians tried to push patrons towards more “serious” literature. My paper also rethinks the role of the librarian herself (usually a woman). Rather than cultural gatekeepers or moral reformers, these women worked as interlocutors with the public—or people who asked questions, found resources, offered suggestions, and helped to foster breakthroughs.
Institutionalized Black archives emerged during this new era of access and agency as trained librarians, not archivists, managed these early twentieth-century Black collections. Students, scholars, and lay intellectuals used Black archives to reject racist hierarchies, histories, and epistemologies. In doing so, they challenged White supremacy as the organizing principle of the modern world.
See more of: AHA Sessions
