China’s New Hygiene Ambassadors: Children, Teachers, and “School Hygiene” in Republican China

Saturday, January 6, 2024: 8:30 AM
Franciscan B (Hilton Union Square)
Sarah Yu, DeSales University
Early hygiene reformists identified the value of starting their endeavors with the education of schoolchildren. The Peking Union Medical College's John B. Grant, for example, wrote in 1922 that the "logical place for educational hygiene" was in a classroom, and that both the physical environment and the receptive audience of primary schools were especially conducive to "sanitary education" that was "direct and rational." While first piloted by foreign missionaries and international organizations, the teaching of "school hygiene" was quickly embraced by local governments, school administrators, and publishing houses around the country. Fundamentally, these stakeholders believed that the best place to start was by changing the attitudes and daily habits of children, a measure they considered politically-neutral and financially expedient.

This paper examines how "school hygiene" was taught and thrived around Republican China. The 1920s and early 1930s saw a proliferation of hygiene textbooks for the use of even the youngest schoolchildren. Designed to teach students to wash their hands, brush their teeth, and pay attention to how they dressed and ate, these materials were simple, everyday lessons that created models for students’ own personal behaviors. Later, the formalization of nursing and basic medical knowledge into teacher training courses indicated an expansion of the types of services expected of educators. Finally, during wartime, schools became centers of hygiene outreach. Far from facing oppressive, national- government demands to conform to hygienic standards, an educational institute’s ability to demonstrate hygiene competence became a symbol of its usefulness and patriotism. Schools and administrators were even able to use their status as potential hygiene ambassadors to leverage additional resources during wartime, as it demonstrated their ability to design and implement progressive initiatives and lead efforts for local mobilization.

Previous Presentation | Next Presentation >>