It has been long understood that pore surface geometry, pore length, and adsorbent material structure play a large role in determining the characteristics of gas adsorption and capillary phenomena in porous materials. Computational models of gas adsorption often involve idealizations that fail to accurately capture experimentally-observed behavior. Density functional theory (DFT) is often used to model adsorption of simple fluids in porous materials, but practically is limited to idealized pores. Conventional DFT requires a very fine discretization of the fluid density distribution to be both accurate and numerically stable[1]. The resultant computational cost precludes the use of DFT in systems with multiple directions of asymmetry. Consequently, conventional DFT is not a practical tool for studying finite-length pores or materials with explicitly rough surfaces.
We have developed a version of nonlocal DFT applicable to finely-discretized lattice fluids that retains elements of both the coarse-grained DFT of Kierlik et al.[2-4] and off-lattice conventional DFT[5]. This DFT is well-suited to the study of fluids in asymmetric materials and small-scaled confinement that cannot be practically modeled with either conventional DFT or coarse-grained lattice-gas DFT. Additionally, it can quantitatively model light gas adsorption in atomistic model of molecular adsorbents and properly describe hysteresis in finite-length pores.
We apply this finely-discretized lattice DFT to study the effect of various pore geometries on adsorption in porous materials. We begin by revisiting the problem of open-ended finite-length pores and discuss desorption hysteresis, pore neck effects, and the oft-asked question of how long a pore need be to be treated as "infinite." Following, we study adsorption in pores with features not present in idealized slits and cylinders, such as closed ends, variable-diameters, and beveled openings. Finally, we go on to study adsorption in pores with rough surfaces and examine the effect of surface roughness on monolayer formation and structure.
[1] Frink and Salinger, J. Comp. Phys., 159, 407 (2000)
[2] Kierlik et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 4361 (1995)
[3] Kierlik et al., Mol. Phys., 95, 341 (1998)
[4] Kierlik et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 055701 (2001)
[5] Siderius and Gelb, Langmuir, 25, 1296 (2009)
See more of this Group/Topical: Separations Division
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)