Pseudo-Component Modeling of Stress Relaxation Behavior of Self-Assembled Polycaprolactone Matrices

Monday, November 8, 2010: 5:05 PM
Grand Ballroom J (Salt Palace Convention Center)
Kornkarn Makornkaewkeyoon, Chemical Engineering, Oklahoma state university, Stillwater, OK, Russell R. Rhinehart, Chemical Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK and Sundararajan V. Madihally, School of Chemical Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK

The objective of this work was to study the effect of strain rate to the stress relaxation behavior of a novel procedure for self-assembled polycaprolactone (PCL) films and propose a pseudo-component model to describe the stress-strain behavior of the material in multiple strain stages. The ramp-and-hold tests were carried out in wet conditions (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS) at 37°C using three different strain rates (0.6%/s, 1.0%/s, and 3.0%/s). The results showed that the effect of strain rate, at least in the range used in the experiment (0%/s -3%/s) was insignificant on stress relaxation behavior.

Composite models with three pseudo-components are chosen with six combinations from four pseudo-components – hyperelastic spring, spring-and-dashpot, retain, and reform. The pseudo-component called “reform” describes an internal structure that reorganizes to its original structure when held in an elongated state for a period of time, and “retain” describes an internal structure that holds its oriented structure while the internal stress is relieved. Both reform and retain account for necking in cross-section reduction due to strain, but the classic spring-and-dashpot model does not. These models were developed and tested for the stress response to five sequential periods of strain and hold. The differential equations representing stress- time relation of the pseudo-components were solved numerically by a semi-implicit finite-difference method using Visual basic programming.

Most of pseudo-components combinations are able to model the multi-strain testing with the value of sum of squares (SSD) lower than 15, but the combination of one hyperelastic and two spring-and-dashpot pseudo-components still gave the best fit. The combination of reform and retain gave a good fit with the SSD of 0.8 for self-assembled PCL film but this pseudo-components combination did not fit as well as the combination of one hyperelastic and two retain pseudo-components or the ones that has the spring-and-dashpot pseudo-component for the traditional chloroform-casted PCL film (SSD = 16.6). In summary, the proposed pseudo-component model approach shows potential for describing and understanding stress relaxation behavior of material.


Extended Abstract: File Not Uploaded
See more of this Session: Advances in Biomaterial Evaluation
See more of this Group/Topical: Materials Engineering and Sciences Division