323732 Nickel Aluminate Spinel Reinforced Porous Ceramic for Membrane Application
Ceramic is a suitable material for membranes because of their high thermal and chemical stability. Ceramic membranes could operate without fouling, melting or swelling under extreme conditions such as high temperature and highly acidic and basic environment, which could not be achieved by polymeric membranes. The brittle nature of ceramic material, however, remains a limitation for the production and application of ceramic membranes in an industry scale. Brittleness is an even more significant held back for extending the use of ceramic hollow fibre membranes which are very small in size and have thin walls, yet have the highest compactness among all current membrane geometries.
The reinforcement of alumina (Al2O3), a common and economical ceramic used in the industry, by nickel aluminate spinel (NiAl2O4) is reported here. This is done by the formation of NiAl2O4 as a new phase in between the Al2O3, through the addition of nickel (II) oxide (NiO) powder in the Al2O3 ceramic precursor. The reaction between NiO and Al2O3 during the sintering of precursors in air formed the new NiAl2O4 phase.
The porous ceramic was produced using alumina powder and NiO powder as starting materials. The powder was mixed in ratios of 0 to 15wt% NiO and dry ball-milled for a homogeneous mixture. The powder was then pressed into bar shape and sintered at 1600oC in air.
X-ray Diffraction (XRD) was used to confirm the complete transformation of NiO into NiAl2O4 during the sintering process. By stoichiometry, the content of NiAl2O4 in the final product ranged from 0 to 42.2wt%. The three-point-bending test showed that as the content of NiAl2O4 increased, the flexural strength of the porous ceramics increased up to a maximum of 146MPa at 14.7 wt% of of NiAl2O4, which is roughly four times of that of the pure alumina sample. The flexural strength then decreased when the NiAl2O4 content is increased further. Porosity and pore size distribution was measured by mercury intrusion. All the ceramics tested had a porosity of over 30% which is appreciable for ceramic membranes. The sample that contained 14.7wt% of NiAl2O4 has the minimum porosity out of all the sample tested, which was only 6% below that of pure alumina. Samples with higher amount of NiAl2O4 than this have porosity higher than pure alumina. The pore size distribution of pure alumina, 14.7wt% of NiAl2O4 and 42.2wt% of NiAl2O4 all fell between the range 0.1-1.6 µm which is within the microfiltration range. The SEM images of the cross sections of the sample shows that as the content of NiAl2O4 went over 14.7wt%, loose particles appeared. These loose particles hindered the close packing of particles as well as shrinkage during sintering, which lead to a drop in flexural strength and increase in porosity. A nitrogen permeance test was carried out to further confirm the feasibility of using NiAl2O4 reinforced porous alumina as a membrane. For all the samples tested, the nitrogen permeance increased with increasing applied pressure. This indicated the macroporous nature of this ceramic, which supported the pore size distributions obtained by mercury intrusion. The nitrogen permeance of the 14.7wt% NiAl2O4 sample was found to be 75% of that of pure alumina.
As a conclusion, the formation of NiAl2O4 in porous alumina successfully increased the flexural of alumina, while the porosity and gas permeance was still satisfying. NiAl2O4 reinforcement is therefore a feasible method for enhancing the flexural strength of ceramic membranes. Future work will be carried out to extend this reinforcement of porous ceramic into ceramic hollow fibre membrane fabrication.
See more of this Group/Topical: Materials Engineering and Sciences Division

Google
Yelp
Facebook
Twitter
ChEnected