Here, we further analyze the effect of the two outer chemical moieties, the choline and phosphoryl groups. For bulk solutions, we compare the behavior of pMPC to poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphate) and show that the removal of the choline group reduces hydration around the polymer. When bound to a substrate, the monolayer analogue to the experimental system did not permit significant inter-chain associations via the choline groups. Simulations of much larger pMPC50 brush layers demonstrate that the choline moiety serves to stabilize the material through non-covalent cross-links between individual strands in the layer. Preliminary results strengthen the previous hypothesis [5] that the choline moiety is responsible for stabilizing the polymer while the phosphoryl moiety contributes to the hydration lubrication mechanism.
[1] M. Chen et al., “Lubrication at Physiological Pressures by Polyzwitterionic Brushes.” Science 2009, 323, 1698–1701.
[2] M. Kyomoto et al., “Biomimetic hydration lubrication with various polyelectrolyte layers on cross-linked polyethylene orthopedic bearing materials.” Biomaterials 2012, 33, 4451-9.
[3] J. Klein, “Hydration lubrication.” Friction 2013, 1, 1-23.
[4] C.Klein, C.R. Iacovella, P.T. Cummings, C. McCabe, “Tunable transition from hydration to monomer-supported lubrication in zwitterionic monolayers revealed by molecular dynamics simulation” Soft Matter 2015, 11, 3340-3346.
[5] W.L. Roussell, C. Klein, C.R. Iacovella, P.T. Cummings, C. McCabe, “Molecular Origins of the Ultra-Low Friction Exhibited by Biocompatible Zwitterionic Polymer Brushes” Young Scientist, May 2015
See more of this Group/Topical: Engineering Sciences and Fundamentals
