393452 Rail Transportation Risk Assessment Comparison: Ethanol Versus LNG
393452 Rail Transportation Risk Assessment Comparison: Ethanol Versus LNG
Wednesday, September 17, 2014: 8:00 AM
Colonial (Plaza Hotel Buenos Aires)
Venting, purging, or blowing down flammable gas-containing piping systems and vessels may pose unintended fire and explosion hazards to personnel. In fact, several high-profile incidents have occurred in recent years highlighting this hazard. Industrial safety standards and guidelines exist as a basis for safely designing venting systems, but can a designer rely solely upon these standards for every situation? Certainly, site-specific constraints can be incorporated into a hazard analysis to understand potential adverse outcomes of a venting process. In this paper we give a brief overview of the existing safety standards applicable to blowdown and gas purging operations of flammable gas-containing systems. In a blowdown, the piping system is relieved of contained fuel gas pressure, typically in order to make the system safe for maintenance or inspection operations. In gas purging, a fuel gas system is freed of air and replaced with fuel gas in order to bring the system into service. We employ consequence modeling software tools to illustrate the influence of relevant system parameters (e.g., pressure, vent orientation, vent elevation, and surrounding congestion) on vapor cloud dispersion and compare the results with respect to the available safety guidelines. Guidance will be presented for the designer to consider when evaluating their specific venting systems.
See more of this Session: Fires, Explosions, and Reactive Chemicals
See more of this Group/Topical: General Program
See more of this Group/Topical: General Program

Google
Yelp
Facebook
Twitter
ChEnected