455424 The House of Integrity: Modern Asset Integrity Management

Tuesday, August 23, 2016: 1:30 PM
Paracas I (Swissotel Lima)
Alejandro C. Torres-Echeverria, Risktec Solutions, Inc., Houston, TX and Steven Saunders, Risktec Solutions, Ltd., Dubai, United Arab Emirates

The House of Integrity: Modern Asset Integrity Management

Alejandro Torres-Echeverria[1] – Senior Consultant

Risktec Solutions, Inc.

15810 Park ten Place, Suite 100

Houston, TX 77084, USA

Phone: +1 281-333-5080; email: Alejandro.Torres@risktec.com

Steven Saunders – Principal Consultant

Risktec Solutions, Ltd

Office 3006, Liwa Heights, Jumeirah Towers, PO Box 450113

Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Phone: +971 4-556-2900; email: Steven.Saunders@risktec.com

Abstract

Asset Integrity Management (AIM) is a widely known and well-defined process that, if applied in the correct way, can offer asset owners and operators the ability to manage risk and assure the integrity of assets throughout their life cycle. The purpose of AIM is for an organization to be able to assert, with confidence and based on the evidence, that their assets are safe and reliable.

The foundation required to build a robust approach to AIM starts with using recognized international standards.  PAS 55:2008, now the ISO 55000 series of standards (ISO, 2014), sets out good practice requirements for managing physical assets and ensures that consistent terminology is applied.  From this foundation an AIM “house” can be built. This paper discusses a model called the “Asset Integrity Management House”, which integrates under one roof all the required disciplines and activities (which so often suffer from a “silo mentality” within an organization) to implement full Asset Integrity Management. This model is illustrated in Figure 1.

The model sub-divides into three floors:

1.   AIM system.   The top floor comprises the system of policies, standards, procedures and resources needed to be in place to deliver integrity over the whole life cycle of an asset.  There is a strong overlap with the process safety management system which aims to prevent major process incidents.  The AIM system should be based on the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) continuous improvement process, with monitoring of performance, auditing of compliance and management review of continued effectiveness.

2.   Integrity, reliability and process safety assessment.  The middle floor is about conducting the relevant integrity, risk, reliability, process hazards and safety case analyses to ensure that integrity risks are understood, the asset is designed and operated to achieve its performance targets, and safety risks are as low as reasonably practicable. This is populated with established methods and techniques, such as Corrosion Control (CC), Risk Based Inspection (RBI), Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP), etc.

3.   Maintenance, inspection and testing.  At the ground floor level is the maintenance, inspection and testing of structures and equipment during operations, which maintain the design intent through life.  Analysis of the results of these activities should be used to identify timely potential developing issues and opportunities for performance improvement.

Spanning all floors is the competence of personnel in performing their tasks to the required standards.

The benefits of such an encompassing simplified model is that each of the different disciplines involved can identify the contribution they are making, and align their processes and work towards achieving a common goal.  For example, some organisations have already brought together their major risk and integrity management groups into one single department.  Another example is the use of performance standards for safety and environmentally critical equipment (SCE) to provide the bridge between the claims in a safety case and the actual on-site maintenance, inspection and testing activities.

Asset integrity management is not just about extracting as much life out of an asset as possible; it is about ensuring consistent and safe performance of the asset, throughout its life, to deliver business objectives profitably and without major incidents.  These goals can be realized following the Asset Integrity Management House model.

References

ISO (2014). ISO 55000:2014, Asset management -- Overview, principles and terminology. International Organization for Standardization. Geneva, Switzerland.

Keywords

Asset integrity, integrity management, process safety management, reliability, maintenance, inspection.



[1] Corresponding Author: Alejandro Torres-Echeverria: Alejandro.torres@risktec.com


Extended Abstract: File Not Uploaded
See more of this Session: Reliability & Mechanical Integrity
See more of this Group/Topical: General Program