297734 Forward Osmosis for the Water Removal From the Aqueous Phase of Pyrolysis Oil
Forward Osmosis for the Water
Removal from the Aqueous Phase of Pyrolysis Oil
Renewable energy consumption has
increased due to the fast depletion of finite fossil fuel reserves, increase of
energy demand and environmental concerns. The high energy production cost for
conventional fuels and political instability of many oil producing countries,
calls for the development of renewable energy resources. Wood and other forms
of biomass including energy crops, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes and nut
shells are some of the main renewable energy resources available. These can be
converted into liquid, gaseous and solid fuels or chemical feedstock at low
cost in environmentally friendly manner [1, 2]. “Energy from biomass based on
short rotation forestry and other energy crops can contribute significantly
towards the objectives of the Kyoto Agreement in reducing the greenhouse gases emissions
and to the problems related to climate change” [2]. So far, there is no
commercially viable way to offset the carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere
produced by fossil fuel combustion. Two-thirds of global anthropogenic carbon
dioxide emissions are contributed by combustion of fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide
is a major greenhouse gas (GHG); therefore it contributes significantly to
climate change with its associated environmental problems [3]. Considering
environmental perspective, there is a need for the promotion of using biomass
derived fuels. Pyrolysis oil
is the biomass based oil that can be used as an alternative fuel. However, recently
there is an increased interest of using the lignins of the pyrolysis oil for
production of various chemicals such as food flavourings, specialities, resins,
agri-chemicals, fertilizers, emissions control agents, etc.; that poses a
challenge in using the pyrolysis oil as the fuel [4]. Due to the demand for
lignins; pyrolysis oil is separated into lignin rich phase and carbohydrates
rich aqueous phase. Removal of lignin rich phase from pyrolysis oil leaves the
oil with less lignin content, higher water content and less energy density;
consequently, the use of this part of oil as a fuel is limited. It is well
known that higher water content with lower energy density limits application of
aqueous phase of the pyrolysis oil as a fuel. It is reported that the water
content of bulk pyrolysis oil without phase separation ranges 15 wt % - 30 wt %
with energy density ~ 19.5 MJ/L [5]. Therefore, reduction of the water content
can increase the energy density of the aqueous phase of the pyrolysis oil; subsequently,
suitable to be used as a combustion fuel. In this study the FO process is used
to remove water from the pyrolysis oil aqueous phase. Cellulose acetate
membranes in flat sheet mode are used in the process. Three different draw
solutions are used: NaCl, MgCl2 and AlCl3 solutions; the
aim is to investigate which draw solution generates high transmembrane flux. The highest flux was found when pyrolysis oil
feed was treated with MgCl2 solution. This was confirmed by analysis of the energy
density and water content which showed that the oil samples treated with the
MgCl2 solution had relatively low water content and high energy
density. The results from the investigations with different draw solutions will
be presented. 1. A. Khodier, P. Kilgallon, N.
Legrave, N. Simms, J. Oakey, T. Bridgwater, Pilot-Scale Combustion of
Fast-Pyrolysis Bio-Oil: Ash Deposition and Gaseous Emissions, Environmental Progress and Sustainable
Energy, 28 (2009) 397-403. 2. A. V. Bridgwater, Renewable Fuels
and Chemicals by Thermal Processing of Biomass, Chemical Engineering Journal, 91 (2003) 87-102. 3. D. Mohan, C. U. Pittman, P. H.
Steele, Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review, Energy & Fuels, 20 (2006) 848-889. 4. A. V. Bridgwater, Renewable Fuels
and Chemicals by Thermal Processing of Biomass, Chemical Engineering Journal, 91 (2003) 87-102. 5. D. Mohan, C. U. Pittman, P. H.
Steele, Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review, Energy & Fuels, 20 (2006) 848-889.
