477089 Where Does Process Fire and Gas Fit in a LOPA ?

Prasad Goteti, Safety Engineering COE, Honeywell Process Solutions, Houston, TX and Nirupama Gopalaswami, Safety COE, Honeywell Process Solutions, Houston, TX

Where does Fire and Gas System (FGS) fit in a LOPA? 

Prasad Goteti, Nirupama Gopalaswami

 Honeywell Process Solutions

Americas Safety Engineering Center of Excellence (COE),

1250 W Sam Houston Parkway, Houston, TX, 77042

Prasad.goteti@honeywell.com

Nirupama.gopalaswami@honeywell.com

Abstract

Fire and Gas Systems provide detection, reduce escalation potential of a hazardous event and initiate emergency response if required. The FGS layer, in most cases, do not achieve or maintain safe state for a process but mitigate the severity of the consequence.

However, while conducting a LOPA, questions arise on how to take credit for a Fire and Gas System, is it a preventive layer or a conditional modifier, the minimum Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD) for the FGS layer and whether the PFD is achievable for a designed and installed FGS layer.

This paper provides insight on these questions and throws light on how to credit a FGS layer through a case study of a real chemical processing unit. The case study involves a LOPA scenario where in a FGS system is credited as an IPL or conditional modifier and is designed and verified using the performance based fire and gas mapping to obtain the target risk level. The fire and gas mapping follows the lifecycle approach defined in ISA84.00.07 to place the detectors in appropriate location to obtain best coverage.

Based on the study, recommendations are provided on how to utilize FGS layer in a LOPA.

 

Keywords

ISA TR84.00.07, FGS, LOPA, IPL, Detection, Mapping


Extended Abstract: File Not Uploaded
See more of this Session: GCPS Electronic Poster Session
See more of this Group/Topical: Global Congress on Process Safety