The benefits of UAS and robotics in reducing human risk, enhanced data collection, and improving productivity are quite clear; however, the hazards of these technologies need to be carefully evaluated to ensure that the devices can be used safely in specific applications. UAS can present collision hazards, and a poorly chosen flight path could result in human injury, significant damage to process equipment, or the loss of the UAS. During internal equipment inspections, UAS and robots can be made of incompatible materials of construction that could contaminate the equipment being inspected, potentially causing chemical reactions or equipment damage leading to loss of integrity. During internal inspections, UAS and robots could also become disabled inside equipment, requiring emergency extrication plans. Another key consideration is hazardous area classification. UAS and robotics are energized devices that could potentially present ignition sources, and consideration of the hazardous area classification of the working area – as well as the certification of the equipment for the specific application - are vital when employing these technologies where hot work permitting practices are not appropriate.
Manufacturing 4.0 provides a compelling vision of a safer production operation, and the use of UAS and robotics can significantly reduce human exposure to process and personal hazards. However, to capitalize on this potential, it is critical that organizations employing these technologies perform thorough hazard analyses and provide tools that can be leveraged at the site level to facilitate hazard identification and the development of safe work plans for specific applications. This paper discusses potential hazards that should be considered when evaluating the suitability of a UAS or robot for a particular application and provides guidance on leveraging hazard recognition tools and training to the site level.
See more of this Group/Topical: Global Congress on Process Safety
