The first barite dissolution experiment followed the method of Averyt et al. (2003). One lab precipitated barite sample and seventeen natural barite samples were dissolved in an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-potassium hydroxide (EDTA-KOH) solution. The solution was prepared with 10 mM EDTA in 0.2 M KOH. The samples were analyzed using ICP-OES after 4-5 days of dissolution.
The second barite dissolution experiment followed the method of Bao (2006). The same set of samples that were dissolved in the EDTA-KOH solution were used in this experiment. The samples were dissolved in a diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-sodium hydroxide (DTPA-NaOH) solution. This solution was prepared with 50 mM DTPA in 1 M NaOH. The barite appeared to dissolve faster using this method and after three days of dissolution, the samples were analyzed using ICP-OES.
The solutions in both methods showed residue from the natural samples after 3-5 days. Solid that was left in the EDTA-KOH solution was analyzed using an Environmental SEM, which showed that in most samples the residue was < 1-10% barite.
Analysis of both solutions on the ICP-OES showed the plasma was more stable when running the EDTA-KOH solution. The relative standard deviation for Sr was around 3% for this method and was much higher when running the DTPA-NaOH solution. This leads to the conclusion that the method by Averyt et al. (2003) is recommended for future work.
The EDTA-KOH solution results from the ICP-OES were also studied. When comparing Sr/Ba of barite and Sr/Ba of the natural waters and other environmental data (e.g., saturation state of barite, temperature, conductivity, [Sr], [SO4], [Ba], Δ88/86Srbarite-water), there were no significant relationships found. Currently, it is unknown if there is a relationship with microbial activity at these sites. Further studies may help to find the controlling factors of the Sr/Ba in these natural barite samples.
Preferred Presentation Type: Poster
