ROYCROFT, Scott J.1, NOEL, Vincent
2, BOYE, Kristin
3, BESANCON, Clemence
4, WEAVER, Karrie L.
4, JOHNSON, Raymond H.
5, DAM, William L.
6, FENDORF, Scott
3 and BARGAR, John R.
2, (1)Earth Systems Science Department, Stanford University, 367 Panama St, Stanford, CA 94305, (2)Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park, CA 94025, (3)Environmental Earth System Science, Stanford University, EESS--Bld 320, Rm 118, Stanford, CA 94305-2115, (4)Dept. of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Building 320, Stanford, CA 94305-2115, (5)Navarro Research and Engineering Inc., 2597 Legacy Way, Grand Junction, CO 81503, (6)U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management, 2597 Legacy Way, Grand Junction, CO 81503, scottr5@stanford.edu
Uranium contaminated groundwater in Riverton, Wyoming persists despite anticipated natural attenuation outside of a former uranium ore processing facility. The inability of natural flushing to dilute the uranium below the regulatory threshold indicates that sediments act as secondary sources likely (re)supplying uranium to groundwater. Throughout the contaminated floodplain, uranium rich-evaporites are readily abundant in the upper 2 m of sediments and are spatially coincident with the location of the plume, which suggests a likely link between evaporites and increased uranium levels. Knowledge of where and how uranium is stored within evaporite-associated sediments is required to understand processes controlling the mobility of uranium. We expect that flooding and seasonal changes in hydrologic conditions will affect U phase partitioning, and thus largely control U mobility. The primary questions we are addressing in this project are:
What is the relative abundance of uranium incorporated in various mineral complexes throughout the evaporite sediments? How do the factors of depth, location, and seasonality influence the relative incorporation, mobility and speciation of uranium?We have systematically sampled from two soil columns over three dates in Riverton. The sampling dates span before and after a significant flooding event, providing insight into the flood’s impact on local uranium mobility. Sequential chemical extractions are used to decipher the reactivity of uranium and approximate U operationally defined within reactants targeting carbonate, silicate, organic, and metal oxide bound or water and exchangeable phases. Extractions throughout the entirety of the sediment cores provide a high-resolution vertical profile of the distribution of uranium in various extracted phases. Throughout the profile, the majority (50-60%) or uranium is bound within carbonate-targeted extracts, a direct effect of the carbonate-rich evaporite sediments. The sum of our analyses provide a dynamic model of uranium incorporation within evaporite sediments holding implications for the fate of uranium throughout contaminated sites across the Colorado River Basin.